Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/1507/2026 of NUNE MADHU VENKATA NAGIREDDY Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 3 May 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 1507/2026 Between: 1. NUNE MADHU VENKATA NAGIREDDY, S/O NUNE APPI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 28
APHC010014052026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 1507/2026
Between:
1. NUNE MADHU VENKATA NAGIREDDY, S/O NUNE APPI
REDDY, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, CONTRACTOR, R/O
D.NO.1-50, REDIA BAZAR, OBULAPURAM, NARUKULLAPADU
VILLAGE, TOLUKODU POST, NTR DISTRICT- 521230.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT
BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522 238.
2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
FINANCE
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT
BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522 238.
3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR IRRIGATION WING, ELURU (WEST
GODAVARI) DISTRICT, ELURU- 534006.
4. THE
DISTRICT
COLLECTOR
IRRIGATION
WING,
NTR
(KRISHNA) DISTRICT, VIJAYAWADA- 520002.
5. THE
SUPERINTENDING
ENGINEER,
KLR
PULICHINTALA
PROJECT CIRCLE, VISSANNAPETA VISSANNAPETA MANDAL,
KRISHNA DISTRICT- 521215.
6. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, NSLBC O AND M DIVISION, NUZVID, KRISHNA DISTRICT- 521201.
7. THE PAY AND ACCOUNT OFFICER, WORKS AND PROJECTS, ELURU, ELURU (WEST GODAVARI) DISTRICT- 534007.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents in not paying the amount of Rs. 18,52,829/- (Rupees Eighteen lakh fifty-two thousand eight hundred and twenty-nine only)
with interest due to the Petitioner under three contractual works executed by him, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, contrary to the principles of natural justice and violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 14, 21 and consequently direct the Respondents to pay the amount of Rs. 18,52,829/- (Rupees Eighteen lakh fifty-two thousand eight hundred and twenty-nine only) along with interest per annum due to the Petitioner under contractual work executed by him within the limits of 6th Respondent and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to pay the amount of Rs.18,52,829/- (Rupees Eighteen lakh fifty-two thousand eight hundred and twenty-nine only) due to the Petitioner under above subject three contractual works executed by him and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. N V MOHANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR IRRI AND CAD
2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Aggrieved by non-payment of bill amount to the petitioner pertaining to CFMS Nos.2025-9160401, 2025-9132287 & 2025-9131904, the present writ petition is filed.
2. Heard Ms.K.V.N.Pallavi, learned counsel representing Sri N.V.Mohana Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Satish Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Irrigation for the respondents.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the authorities have paid the entitled amounts to the petitioner and there remains nothing for adjudication, accordingly, prayed to close the writ petition.
4. Recording the said submission, as the authorities have paid the amounts to the petitioner, there remains nothing for adjudication, accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Date: 04th May, 2026
RKS