Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/10811/2026 of M CHINNA SANJEEVAMMA Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 3 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 10811/2026 Between: 1. M CHINNA SANJEEVAMMA, D/O P. POLAIAH, W/O. M. RAGHAVULU,

APHC010212882026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF MAY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH

WRIT PETITION NO: 10811/2026

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. M CHINNA SANJEEVAMMA, D/O P. POLAIAH, W/O. M. RAGHAVULU, AGE ABOUT 22 YEARS, OCC PUBLIC HEALTH WORKER (SWEEPER), O/O. NARASAPUR MUNICIPALITY, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETAIY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522238.

2. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, STATE OF A.P., MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT -522302.

3. THE DISTRICT TREASURY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT-534201.

4. THE ASSISTANT TREASURY OFFICE, DIVISIONAL SUB- TREASURY, NARASPUR WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT- 534275.

5. THE NARASPUR MUNICIPALITY, REP. BY MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, NARASPUR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 534275.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd and 4th respondents not allotting employee CFMS ID through Nidhi Portal for sanction and releasing the pay and allowances (salary) and other benefits to the petitioner even though the petitioner discharging her duties as Public Health Worker on Compassionate Grounds from 23.01.2025 as highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust, and contrary to service rules and violation of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd and 4th respondents to allot CFMS ID to the petitioner and to release salary to the petitioner from 23.01.2025 with all consequential benefits and pas IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the 3rd & 4th respondents to allot CFMS ID to the petitioner and to release salary to the petitioner from 23.01.2025 forthwith and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. T S N SUDHAKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. SIREESHA RANI VALLABHANENI SC For MUNICIPALITIES

2. GP FOR SERVICES I

The Court made the following Order: The present writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents in not allotting employee CFMS ID through NIDHI Portal for sanction and releasing the pay and allowances (salary) and other benefits to the petitioner even though the petitioner discharging her duties as Public Health Worker on Compassionate Grounds from 23.01.2025 as illegal and arbitrary.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

3. The petitioner was appointed by the 5threspondent vide orders dated 22.01.2025 and since then the petitioner discharging her duties as Public Health Worker. Despite the requests made by the petitioner, the 4threspondent has not considered and not allotted the CFMS ID and in view of the said action the 5th respondent is not able to pay the salaries to the petitioners.

4. Considering the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the 4threspondent to consider the correspondence made by the 5th respondent dated 09.12.2025 and pass appropriate orders within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order. It is needless to mention that the 4threspondent may not take any objection with regard to petitioner on the ground that she is a married daughter because the identical issue has been considered by the Division Bench of this Court and held that the petitioner therein/ married daughter is also entitled for compassionate appointment. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall standclosed. ___________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH

Date:04.05.2026 sj

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH

WRIT PETITION NO:10811of 2026

Dated:04.05.2026

sj

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead