Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/12722/2026 of KAMMANA SUBRAMANYA REDDY Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 3 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 12722/2026 Between: 1. KAMMANA SUBRAMANYA REDDY, S/O RAMI REDDY AGED ABOUT 66

APHC010219582026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF MAY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH

WRIT PETITION NO: 12722/2026

Between:

1. KAMMANA SUBRAMANYA REDDY, S/O RAMI REDDY

AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, OCC RETIRED ARSI, R/O 2-20- 2/44, GANESH NAGAR, UPPAL, RANGA REDDY DISTRICT, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY,

HOME

DEPARTMENT,

STATE

SECRETARIAT

BUILDING,

VELAGAPUDI,

GUNTUR

DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH,522238

2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE

DGP, MANGALAGIRI, ANDHRA PRADESH.522503

3. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, APSP

BATTALIONS, MANGALAGIRI, ANDHRA PRADESH.522503

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to pass an order or

direction or a writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus 1. Declaring Rule 3 of the Andhra Pradesh Police (Special Police Battalions) Subordinate Service Rules, notified vide G.O.Ms.No.69, Home (Police-D) Department, dated07-04-1997, and Rule 1(b) of G.O.Ms.No.85, Home (Police-D) Department, dated 28- 04-1997, insofar as they provide for Commandant of each Battalion as the appointing authority, battalion-wise seniority, and battalion- wise promotions up to the rank of Assistant Reserve Sub-Inspector in respect of posts of Police Constable, Head Constable and Assistant Reserve Sub-Inspector in the Andhra Pradesh Special Police Battalions, as being contrary to and unenforceable in view of the Andhra Pradesh Public Employment (Organisation of Local Cadres and Regulation of Direct Recruitment) Order, 1975 dated 20-10-1975 issued under Article 371-D of the Constitution of India

2. Declaring that the posts of Police Constable (PC), Head Constable (HC) and Assistant Reserve Sub-Inspector (ARSI) in the Andhra Pradesh Special Police Battalions are State cadre posts, to which State-wide seniority must apply 3. Directing the Respondents to prepare and follow a common State-wide seniority list for the aforesaid categories in accordance with the Presidential Order 4.

Directing the Respondents to place the Petitioner above all his juniors who were promoted earlier under the illegal battalion-wise regime, and to grant all consequential notional and service benefits in accordance with law 5. and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the Respondents to refrain from effecting promotions from Police Constable to Head Constable and from Head Constable to Assistant Reserve Sub-Inspector on battalion-wise seniority under G.O. Ms. No. 69 dated 07-04-1997 and G.O. Ms. No. 85 dated 28- 04-1997, insofar as the same affects the Petitioner's rights, and pass

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. A SRINATH

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR SERVICES I

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition giving liberty to the petitioner to file fresh writ petition.

2. Permission is granted to withdraw the writ petition.

3. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn giving liberty to the petitioner to file fresh writ petition. No order as cots. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH

Date:04.05.2026 GK

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH

WRIT PETITION NO: 12722 of 2026

Dated:04.05.2026

GK

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead