Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/12475/2026 of Sri Chandaka Satyanarayana Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 3 May 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 12475/2026 Between: 1. SRI CHANDAKA SATYANARAYANA, S/O LATE CH. CHINNAM NAIDU.
APHC010238062026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO: 12475/2026
Between:
1. SRI
CHANDAKA
SATYANARAYANA,
S/O
LATE
CH.
CHINNAM NAIDU. AGED 35 YEARS, OCC. DEPUTY
TAHSILDAR,
WORKING
ASTAHSILDAR
(FAC),
PARAVTHIPURAM MANDAL PARAVTHIPURAM, MANYAM
DISTRICT. FORMALLY VIJAYANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY
ITS SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY, REVENUE (SERVICES)
DEPARTMENT,
AP
SECRETARIAT
BUILDINGS,
VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH-522503.
2. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, 1ST AND 3RD
FLOOR, APIIC BUILDINGS, AUTO NAGAR NEAR NRI
HOSPITALS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT -522503.
3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PARAVTHIPURAM MANYAM
DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ or order or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents in not considering the case of the Petitioner for regular promotion to the post of Tahsildar from the post of Deputy Tahsildar though he is fully eligible, qualified and within the Zone of consideration except pending charge memo issued in G.O.Rt.No.584 Revenue (Vigilance-Ill) Department Dated 30-08-2024 of 1st Respondent which was issued based on a minor allegations detected way back on 2.09.2020 as illegal, arbitrary, violative of G.O.Ms.No.91 General Administration (SER.C) Dept dated12.08.2022 and against Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequentially direct the Respondents to consider the Petitioner's case for regular promotion to the post of Tahsildar, Zone-1 without reference to Charge Memo issued in G.O.Rt.No.584 Revenue (Vigilance-Ill)
Department Dated 30-08-2024 of 1st Respondent in terms of in terms of Para-5 (B) (i) of G.O.Ms.No.257 General Administration (SER.C) Dept dated 10.06.1999 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 2'^^
respondent to consider the case of the petitioner for regular promotion as Tahsildar from the post Deputy Tahsildar in terms of Para-5 (B) (i) of G.O.Ms.No.257 General Administration (SER.C)
Dept dated; 10.06.1999 without reference to the charge memo issued in G.O.Rt.No.584 Revenue (Vigilance-Ill) Department Dated:
30-08-2024 of 1®* Respondent and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. HARINATH REDDY SOMAGUTTA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES I
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The present writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents in not considering the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Tahsildar on regular basis on the ground of pending the charge memo dated 30.08.2024 against him, as illegal and arbitrary.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.
3. A charge memo vide G.O.Rt.No.584, Revenue (Vigilance-III) Department dated 30.08.2024 was issued to the petitioner framing charges. The petitioner submitted a written explanation on 27.03.2026 requesting the respondent-authorities to consider his case for promotion in view of G.O.Ms.No.257 dated 10.06.1999 taking into consideration the initiation of enquiry and the timing of issuance of the charge memo which was issued before promotions.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the respondents have not considered the case of the petitioner for promotion, despite his seniority and clean service record.
5. Learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents on instructions submits that it is an admitted fact that the petitioner was shown in the seniority list and he will be considered for promotion, if he is otherwise eligible.
6. Having heard the respective submissions, this Court is of the opinion that the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Tahsildar, on regular basis can be considered in terms of G.O.Ms.No.257, dated 10.06.1999.
7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to consider the petitioner’s case for promotion to the post of Tahsildar on regular basis subject to the petitioner possessing requisite qualifications in terms of G.O.Ms.No.257, General Administration (Ser.C) Department, dated 10.06.1999 and also conclude the enquiry, if any pending, in terms of G.O.Ms.No.91, General Administration (Ser.C) Department, dated 12.09.2022. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
Date:04.05.2026 GK
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO: 12475 of 2026
Dated:04.05.2026
GK