Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/13013/2025 of GUDISE DVANAND Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 3 May 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 13013/2025 Between: 1. GUDISE DVANAND, S/O LATE GANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O
APHC010256712025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
WRIT PETITION NO: 13013/2025
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. GUDISE DVANAND, S/O LATE GANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O 1-11124-44, WATERTANK RAOD, KADIRI POST AND TOWN KADIRI MANDALAM, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT.
3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KADIRI TOWN POLICE STATION.
4. N SETTY BABU, S/O RANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O 10/21-02-33, NIJAMVALIKAVINI KADIRI TOWN, SATYA SAI DISTRICT
5. SK SAWAF, S/O ALI MURTUZA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 1-742, BYPASS ROAD, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT
6. IDUGOTU ASHOK, S/O GANGULAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 10-12-243, NIJAMVALIKAVINI KADIRI TOWN, SATYA SAI DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
SS, J W.P.No.13013 of 2025
pleased tomay be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly writ of mandamus declaring the action of Respondent no. 2 and 3 in not disposing of the application filed by the petitioner herein for taking action against the Respondent No. 4 to 6 for not allowing the Petitioners to enter into the land and caused damages to compound wall even though they are rightful owners of the property in relation to the land in Sy. No. 71-3 an extent of Ac 0-23 cents Sy. No. 71-A an extent of 0.11 cents situated at Devanand Colony, Hindupuram Road, Kadiri Municipality, is illegal, arbitrary, and a violation of the principles of natural justice is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, and violative of articles 14, 21 and 300-A and consequently pleased to direct respondent No. 2 and 3 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 29- 04-2025 and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct respondent No. 2 & 3 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 29-04-2025 pending disposal of writ petition pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. ALA CHANDRASEKHAR YADAV Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
SS, J W.P.No.13013 of 2025
The Court made the following Order:
The petitioner has approached this Court alleging that the Police Authorities, in spite of receiving a representation, have not registered a crime.
2. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submits that Crime No.157/2025 has been registered, on the said representation of the petitioner
3. Taking note of the submission of the respondent authorities, the instant Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
_______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J
04.05.2026
MJA
SS, J
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
WRIT PETITION NO: 13013/2025
04.05.2026
MJA