Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/22659/2024 of KAMURI RAJA GOPAL REDDY Vs THE UNION OF INDIA on 30 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT PETITION NO: 22659 of 2024 Bench Sr.No:-12 [3579] Kamuri Raja Gopal Reddy ...Petitioner Vs. The Union of India and others ...Respondents ********** Advocate for Petitioner : Mrs. K S G Padmavathi representing Mrs. Marella Radha Advocate(s) for
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
APHC010443802024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 22659 of 2024 Bench Sr.No:-12
Kamuri Raja Gopal Reddy ...Petitioner Vs. The Union of India and others ...Respondents ********** Advocate for Petitioner : Mrs. K S G Padmavathi representing Mrs. Marella Radha Advocate(s) for Respondent(s) : Mrs. S. Pranathi (Special Government Pleader) for State, Mr T. Venkateshwar representing Mrs Tata Venkata Sridevi [Standing Counsel for Dr.NTR University of Health Sciences].
CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE LISA GILL SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA DATE : 1st May, 2026 LISA GILL, CJ.
Prayer in this writ petition is for considering case of petitioner for admission to MBBS/BDS courses under category of Children of Armed Forces/CRFP personnel disabled in action and invalidated from service on medical grounds as per G.O.Ms.No.192 dated 26.08.1993 read with G.O.Ms.No.59 dated 16.05.2018.
2. It is pointed out that vide order dated 24.10.2024, respondent – Dr NTR University of Health Sciences was directed to consider representation
WP-22659-2024
to be submitted by petitioner and pass appropriate orders within a week thereafter. Consequent to submission of representation, order dated 30.10.2024 was passed, rejecting petitioner’s representation.
3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that file of this petition along with no objection has been taken by petitioner. She pleads no instructions as on today. None else appears on behalf of petitioner and neither is he present in person.
4. Learned counsel for respondents point out that no notice in any other fresh writ petition challenging order dated 30.10.2024 has been received and neither is an application seeking amendment of present petition filed.
5. It appears that petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing this writ petition.
6. Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of accordingly.
LISA GILL, CJ
NINALA JAYASURYA, J Vjl