Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/3185/2022 of Bezawada Siva Satya Rama Krishna Vs Smt.P.Prashanthi on 30 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3185/2022 Between: Bezawada Siva Satya Rama Krishna and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND Smt P
APHC010305452022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3207]
FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3185/2022
Between:
Bezawada Siva Satya Rama Krishna and Others
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
Smt P Prashanthi and Others
...CONTEMNOR(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. TURAGA SAI SURYA
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI
2. P SUBASH
3. RAMA CHANDRA RAO GURRAM
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
CONTEMPT CASE No.3185 of 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Contempt Case has been filed against the respondents complaining willful disobedience of the order, dated 21.09.2021 in W.P.No.14825 of 2021.
2. During the course of hearing of this case, Mr. G. Ramachandra Rao, learned counsel for the respondent No.1, Mr. P. Subash, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.2 & 3 and Mr. I. Koti Reddy, learned counsel for the respondent No.4 would submit that due to pendency, there was some delay in implementing the order of the Court, but finally the order of the Court is complied with and all encroachments are removed as directed by this Court by the concerned officers and they placed the photographs in support of the same.
3. Having considered the material placed by the learned counsel for the respondents, it appears that all the encroachments are removed. In view of the same, this Court is satisfied that the order of the Court has been complied with.
4. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and in view of the removal of the encroachments, all those encroachers do not have any shelter at present to reside. In view of the same, this Court expects that the concerned officers i.e. District Collector, Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO) and Tahsildar, shall take appropriate steps to provide house sites and other assistance for construction of houses, if they are otherwise eligible under any Government Housing Schemes, provided for landless poor persons.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the Contempt Case shall stand closed.
___________________________
JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
Date: 01.05.2026 CVD