Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/1378/2026 of PENUMATSA SUBBARAJU Vs SEERAM RAJKUMAR on 30 April 2026
ANDHRA PRADESH::AT AMARAVATI MAIN CASE: C.R.P.No.1378 of 2026 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 1. 01.05.2026 DEV, J Notice before admission. Issue notice to the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to take out personal notice to the respondents through RPAD
APHC010237402026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3207]
FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1378/2026
Between:
1. PENUMATSA SUBBARAJU, S/O GOPALARAJU, AGED ABOUT 74
YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O KOMARIGIRI VILLAGE, I.
POLAVARAM MANDAL, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA
DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SEERAM RAJKUMAR, S/O SURYANAIAYANA, AGED ABOUT 48
YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O FLAT NO. C3, SESHADRI
TOWERS, RAMANAYYAPETA, KAKINADA.
2. KOMMULA MANGA RAJAKUMARI, W/O GANGARAJU, R/O D.NO. 6- 1- 12/1, RAMAKRISHNA NAGAR, ARNALAPURAM.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order dated 16-02-2026 passed in LA. No. 2 of 2026
in O.S.No.116 of 2019 on the file of the Court of the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Cum Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Mummidivaram allow the said application by directing the trial Court to obtain specimen signatures and thumb impressions of the petitioner and send Ex.Al for expert opinion and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in O.S. No. 116 of 2019 on the file of the Court of the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Cum Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mummidivaram, pending disposal of the Civil Revision Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. MAKIREDDY MANOJ
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
CIVIL REVISOIN PETITION No.1378 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
After advancing arguments to some extent, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition and requested to grant liberty to file a fresh interlocutory application before the trial Court along with contemporaneous signatures.
2. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the trial Court by filing a fresh Interlocutory Application. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
Dated: 01.05.2026 CVD