Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/9666/2025 of VELAGA SRIRAMA MURTHY Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 28 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: Between: 1. VELAGA SRIRAMA MURTHY, S/O RAMA RAO, AGE 48 YEARS, RESIDENT OF KOMATIGUNTA VILLAGE, GOPLAPURAM MANDAT, EAST GODAVARI
APHC010186272025
IN TH
WEDNESDAY
TWO
THE HONOURA
W
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. VELAGA SRIRAMA RESIDENT OF KOM EAST GODAVARI D
1. THE STATE OF A CONSUMER AFF DEPARTMENT,
GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. THE DISTRICT CO
3. THE JOINT RAJAMAHENDRAV
4. THE DISTRICT RAJAMAHENDRAV
5. THE REVENUE DIV DISTRICT.
6. THE TAHSILDAR, DISTRICT.
7. THE DEPUTY T GODAVARI DISTRI E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Y, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF AP O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL RIT PETITION NO: 9666/2025 A MURTHY, S/O RAMA RAO, AG MATIGUNTA VILLAGE, GOPLAPUR DISTRICT. AND ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS AIRS FOOD AND CIVIL SUPP SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, T. LLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTR COLLECTOR CIVIL VARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT CIVIL SUPPLY OFFICER, EAST VARAM. VISIONAL OFFICER, KOVVURU, EAS GOPLAPURAM MANDAL EAS TAHSILDAR, GOPLAPURAM MAN ICT. DESH
PRIL LAPATI GE 48 YEARS, RAM MANDAT, ...PETITIONER SECRETARY, LIES (CS. I) VELAGAPUDI, RICT. SUPPLIES, T. T GODAVARI, ST GODAVARI T GODAVARI NDAL EAST
8. SRI MATANGIMATHA AGROS PRIVATE LIMITED, REP.BY ITS MANGING DIRECTOR KOMATIGUNTA VILLAGE, GOPLALAPURAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue may be pleased to issue a Writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents in not taking any action against the petitioner's representation dt. 22.01,2025, regarding to stop the further Rice supply and other charges to the 8th respondent, in view of the Criminal cases filed against the 8th respondent rice mill which is illegal, arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice and violation of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently to direct the Respondents no.2 to 4, to take necessary action on the petitioner's representation, dt. 22.01.2025 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 3 and 4 to consider the petitioner’s representation dt.22.01.2025; pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. ALA CHANDRASEKHAR YADAV Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
2. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES
The Court made the following order:
Though the matter is listed today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. On earlier occasions also i.e., on 15.04.2026, 05.03.2026 and 18.02.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications are closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 29.04.2026 MP
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 9666 of 2025 Date: 29.04.2026
MP