Andhra Pradesh High Court
ITTA/358/2010 of M/S BUSAM VENKATESWARULU AND OTHERS, VIZIANAGARAM. Vs THE COMMISISONER OF INCOME TAX, VISAKHAPATNAM. on 28 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3545] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A . HARI HARANADHA SARMA INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 358/2010
APHC010246602010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 358/2010
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. M/S BUSAM VENKATESWARULU AND OTHERS, VIZIANAGARAM., VIZIANAGARAM.
...APPELLANT AND
1. THE COMMISISONER OF INCOME TAX VISAKHAPATNAM, Visakhapatnam. A.P.
...RESPONDENT Appeal under section _______ against orders condone the delay of 171 days in representing the ITTA.SR.No.1898 of 2008
dispense with filing of certified copy of order passed in ITA.No. 270/V/02 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench, Visakhapatnam dated 8-2-2008 , this appeal willbe heard along with other appeal
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. K NEERAJA Counsel for the Respondent:
1. ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI
2. K RAJI REDDY(SENIOR SC_ INCOME TAX DEPT) The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No.358 of 2010 JUDGMENT:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) None appeared on behalf of appellant on the last date of hearing.
2. Today, despite the matter being called twice, there is no representation on behalf of appellant, though the appeal had been listed under the caption “for Dismissal” and despite learned counsel for appellant being notified.
3. It appears that appellant is not interested in pursuing the matter any longer.
4. Appeal is accordingly dismissed in default and for non- prosecution.
5. Copy of this order be conveyed to the appellant at the given address.
6. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of accordingly.
__________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
__________________________________ JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA Date: 29.04.2026 SA
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No.358 of 2010 Date: 29.04.2026
SA