Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP(PIL)/94/2026 of B V S S RAMESH KUMAR Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 28 April 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WP(PIL) NO: 94 of 2026 Bench Sr.No:-6 [3579] B V S S Ramesh Kumar ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh and others ...Respondents ********** Advocate for Petitioner : Mr M Venkata Sai Nikhil Kashyap Advocate(s) for Respondent(s) :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
APHC010163662026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
WP(PIL) NO: 94 of 2026 Bench Sr.No:-6
B V S S Ramesh Kumar ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh and others ...Respondents ********** Advocate for Petitioner : Mr M Venkata Sai Nikhil Kashyap Advocate(s) for Respondent(s) : GP for Land Acquisition, GP for Home, GP for Registration and Stamps, Mr V V Satish (Standing Counsel for APEPDCL), Mr ASC Bose (Standing Counsel for GVMC), Mr S. Ganesh Babu (Standing Counsel for VMRDA).
CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE LISA GILL SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA DATE : 29th April, 2026
LISA GILL, CJ.
Allegations raised in this writ petition are that there has been tampering of revenue record as well as causing its disappearance in respect of Government land to an extent of Ac.2.37 cents situated at S.No.34/1 of Bakkannapalem, Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam and that illegal constructions have mushroomed thereon.
HCJ & NJS, J WP(PIL)_94_2026
2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that representation dated 06.03.2025 has been submitted bringing entire facts to the notice of authorities but no action has been taken.
3. Having heard learned counsel, at this stage, we consider it appropriate to direct respondent No.3 – District Collector, Visakhapatnam, to look into allegations regarding tampering and disappearance of revenue record, after affording an opportunity of hearing to petitioner and decide representation by passing a speaking order.
4. Writ Petition (PIL) is, accordingly, disposed of. No costs.
Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of accordingly.
LISA GILL, CJ
NINALA JAYASURYA, J Vjl