Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/2308/2023 of BAYANA HERAMBA KUMAR Vs TALLAPANENI VENKATESWARA RAO on 28 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION Between: 1. BAYANA HERAMBA KUMAR, S/O.LATE APPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O.CHITTINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 1. TALLAPANENI VENKATESWARA RAO,
APHC010470002023
IN TH
WEDNESDAY
TWO
THE HONOURA
CIVIL R
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. BAYANA HERAMB 49 YEARS, R/O.CH
1. TALLAPANENI V ABOUT 47 YEARS
2. MALLAVARAPU YEARS, R/O.VIJAY
3. DEVINENI CHAN ABOUT 48 YEA KACHINKARCHER
4. MACHARLA PRAS R/O.JOJI NAGAR DISTRICT
5. KOMMAJI MALLE ABOUT 50 YEARS
6. CHALLA VENKAT ABOUT 45 YEARS DISTRICT.
7. JUJJAVARAPU ABOUT 58 YEARS E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Y, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF AP O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL REVISION PETITION NO: 2308/2023 BA KUMAR, S/O.LATE APPA RAO, HITTINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHN AND VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O.RAMA S, R/O.KANCHIKACHERLA, KRISHNA MAHESH, S/O.PRAKASH, AGED YAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. NDRA SEKHAR, S/O.SRIMANNARA RS, R/O.D.NO.10-4, GOTTUMUK RLA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. SAD, S/O.THIRUPATHI, AGED ABO R, BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-1 ESWARA RAO, S/O MURTHYALL S TA DURGA RAO, S/O.SOBHANACH S, R/O.K.L.RAO NAGAR, VIJAYAWA SURYARAJU, S/O.JOHN. CHRIS S, R/O.TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT DESH
PRIL LAPATI AGED ABOUT NA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER A RAO, AGED A DISTRICT. D ABOUT 43 AYANA, AGED KKALA ROAD, UT 43 YEARS, 12, KRISHNA INGAM AGED HALAM, AGED ADA, KRISHNA STIAN, AGED .
8. YEDIDA VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA, S/O.SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O.VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
9. PADALA DURGA RAO, S/O.PAPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O.VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
10. ALAMURI NARAYANA RAO, S/O.RAMA RAO, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O.VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
11. SUNKARA SATYANARAYANA CHOWDARY, S/O.LAKSHMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O.VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
12. PAGIDIPALLI NAGAIAH, S/O. RATNAM, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O.VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
13. SHAIK MAHABOOB, S/O.DADA SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O.VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
14. SHAIK CHINA HUSSIAN, S/O.NANNE SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 46 YEAS, R/O.VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
15. SHAT BAB VALI, S/O.A.RNEER, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O.VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT,
16. KOTHAMASU POORNACHANDRA RAO, S/O.SURYANARAYANA,
17. DEVISETTY SRIRAMULU, S/O.SURANNA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O.VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
18. VELAGA RAMANAIDU, S/O.APPALA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O.VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
19. INAPAKURTHI SATYANARAYANA, APPALA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O.VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
20. SHAIK MASTAN VALI, S/O.SHAIK DADA VALI, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O.VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to begs to present the above Revision Petition in this Honourable Court aggrieved by the Decree and Order dt. 02- 08-2023 in E.A.No.127 of 2023 in E.A.No.240 of 2012 in E.P.No.60 of 2011 O.S.No. 43 of 2000 on the file of the Court of the II Additional District Judge at Vijayawada, Krishna District IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Honourable Court grant ad interim injunction restraining the respondents from alienating, creating any encumbrance in any manner over the schedule property in E.A.No.240 of 2012 in E.P.No.60 of 2011 in O.S.No. 43 of 2000 on the file of the court of the II Additional District Judge at Vijayawada, Krishna District, pending disposal of the above Revision Petition in this Honourable Court and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. M L ALI
2. The Court made the following order:
Sri Ch.Ganesh, learned counsel, representing Sri Sai Gangadhar Chamarty, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition. Permission, as sought for, is accorded.
Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 29.04.2026 MP
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2308 OF 2023 Dated : 29.04.2026
MP