Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/11890/2026 of MARISETTY SURYANARAYANA Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 27 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 11890/2026 Between: 1. MARISETTY SURYANARAYANA, S/O VEERANNA, AGED ABOUT 70
APHC010230092026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
WRIT PETITION NO: 11890/2026
Between:
1. MARISETTY SURYANARAYANA, S/O VEERANNA, AGED ABOUT
YEARS,
OCC.
AGRICULTURE,
R/O.
D.NO.
2-21,
SUBHADRAMPETA
VILLAGE,
RANGAMPETA
MANDAL,
RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM
DISTRICT,
ERSTWHILE
EAST
GODAVARI DISTRICT-533291
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT
BUILDINGS,
SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI,
AMARAVATI,
GUNTUR DISTRICT-522241.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT
RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM-533101.
3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM
DISTRICT
ERSTWHILE
EAST
GODAVARI DISTRICT-533101.
4. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, EAST DIVISION, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM DISTRICT
ERSTWHILE EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT-533101.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents herein particularly Respondent No.2 to 4 in not accepting the request made by the Petitioner along with other members of the Fishermen Co- operative Society Limited of Doddigunta village, Rangampeta Mandal, Rajamahendravaram District, Erstwhile East Godavari District in change of Police Officers of l)Rangampeta 2)Anaparthi 3)Bikkavolu 4)Pedapudi and to engage other police officers of other Mandal in conduction of Election to the Doddigunta Fishermen Co-operative Society Limited of Rangampeta Mandal, East Godavari District in the ensuring elections scheduled on 29.04.2026 basing on the proceedings issued by the Respondent No.2 vide Progs. No.564/A3/2025, dated. 31.01.2026 as nothing but illegal, arbitrary, erroneous, highhanded and violative of article 14 and 21 of The Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No.2 to 4 to engage other police officers not from
l)Rang8impeta 2)Anaparthi 3)Bikkavolu 4)Pedapudi in conduction of Elections of Doddigunta Fishermen Society Limited, Rangampeta Mandal, East Godavari District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased leased to direct the Respondent No.2 to 4 to change the Police Officers of l)Rangampeta 2)Anaparthi 3)Bikkavolu 4)Pedapudi in conduction of elections of Doddigunta Fishermen Co-operative Society Limited, Rangampeta Mandal, East Godavari District on 29.04.2026 with other police officers, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. A K KISHORE REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
WRIT PETITION NO: 11890/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The petitioner is a member of the Doddigunta Fishermen Cooperative Society Limited. The election of the said Society was supposed to be conducted on 05.03.2026. The petitioner, under apprehension of unfair election process, approached this Court by filing W.P.No. 6023 of 2026. This Court, upon considering the prayer of the petitioner, has passed an order dated 02.03.2026, directing the authority concerned to take appropriate steps so that free, fair and transparent election can be conducted. However, the facts suggest that the election could not be conducted on 05.03.2026, it is supposed to be conducted on 29.04.2026. The petitioner is under apprehension that as this Court while disposing of W.P. No.6023 of 2026 directed the concerned authority to conduct election on 05.03.2026 in free, fair and transparent manner, the same may not be followed if it held on 29.04.2026.
2. I make it clear that the direction upon the respondent authority is very general to conduct the election in a free, fair, and transparent manner.
3. Learned counsel for the parties frankly submit that the same directions may be passed in respect of election dated 29.04.2026.
4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of following direction of this Court passed in W.P.No.6023 of 2026 only reading the date of 05.03.2026 to be 29.04.2026. I further make it clear that the authority concerned shall conduct the election to be held on 29.04.2026 in a free, fair, and transparent manner.
5. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Dt.28.04.2026 BV