Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/663/2022 of MARAMUDI AMRUTH RAO Vs MOLEPATI VENKATA RAMANA KUMAR on 27 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 663/2022 Between: MARAMUDI AMRUTH RAO, S/O. BABU RAO, AGED
APHC010381942022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 663/2022
Between:
MARAMUDI AMRUTH RAO, S/O. BABU RAO, AGED ABOUT 50
YEARS, OCC. GOVT. EMPLOYEE, R/O. PASUMARRU VILLAGE, PAMARRU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. MOLEPATI
VENKATA
RAMANA
KUMAR,
S/O.VENKATA
KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O.
VUYYURU, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
2. THE
STATE
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH,
REP.
ITS
PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR AT HIGH COURT OF A.P. AT AMARAVATI.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. O UDAYA KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. SAMANTHA KRISHNA SRIRAMAKAVACHAM
2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The Criminal Revision Case under Sections 397 and 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘Cr.P.C’) has been filed by the Petitioner / Accused, impugning the judgment dated 30.06.2022 in Crl.A.No.65 of 2015 on the file of the Court of XI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Gudivada, which was passed confirming the judgment dated 24.03.2015 passed in C.C.No.639 of 2013 by the learned Junior Civil Judge, Vuyyuru for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short ‘N.I.Act’).
2. Heard Sri O.Udaya Kumar, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Sri Samantha Krishna Sriramakavacham, learned counsel for Respondent No.1 / Complainant. Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor is in attendance.
3. Both parties appeared before this Court and represented that they intend to compromise the matter. An amount of Rs.50,000/- is paid by the Accused to the Complainant before this Court towards final settlement in this matter. Petitioner / Accused would submit that he has three daughters and he got married them. Respondent No.1 would submit that he has no objection to record the compromise and to acquit the Accused by allowing the Criminal Revision Case.
4. Considering the submissions, and in view of the amicable settlement of the matter and in the interests of justice, the Criminal Revision Case is allowed setting aside the concurrent judgments dated 30.06.2022 in Crl.A.No.65 of 2015 on the file of the Court of XI Additional District and
Sessions Judge, Gudivada, and dated 24.03.2015 passed in C.C.No.639 of 2013 by the learned Junior Civil Judge, Vuyyuru for the offence under Section 138 of N.I.Act and the Petitioner / Accused is acquitted. Respondent No.2 / Complainant is permitted to withdraw the amount, if any, deposited before the trial Court. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor is requested to enquire about the genuineness of the statement given by the Petitioner that he got three daughters.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________________________
Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:28.04.2026 Dinesh
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No:663 OF 2022
Dt.28.04.2026
Dinesh