Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/2096/2018 of J NAGABHUSHANAM Vs Sri G.Veerapandyan, IAS on 27 April 2026

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3558] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA CONTEMPT CASE No.2096 of 2018 Between:

APHC010572132018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

CONTEMPT CASE No.2096 of 2018

Between:

1. J NAGABHUSHANAM, S/O YELLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST.

2. J.HARIHARA NAIDU, S/O SIVASANKAR NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST.

3. K. RANGAPPA, S/O LATE RAMANJANEYULU, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST.

4. E. SOMASEKHARA GOUD, S/O LATE KISTAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF KESAVAPURAM VILLAGE, GARLADINNE MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. SRI G.VEERAPANDYAN, IAS, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT, AT ANANTHAPURAMU.

...CONTEMNOR Counsel for the Petitioner(s):

1. P NARASIMHULU Counsel for the Contemnor:

1. K M KRISHNA REDDY The Court made the following:

Page 1 of 2

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA CONTEMPT CASE No.2096 of 2018 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)

This contempt case has been filed by the petitioners complaining non-compliance with the order dated 06.02.2018 passed by this Court in W.P(PIL).No.20 of 2018 by the respondent/contemnor.

2. The respondent/contemnor is present before the Court physically today.

3. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the order of the Court has been complied with.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners also, on instructions, submits that the order of the Court has been complied with.

5. Therefore, the contempt case is closed.

As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, in this case shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

______________________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA Date: 28.04.2026 IBL

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

CONTEMPT CASE No.2096 of 2018

Dt: 28.04.2026 IBL

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead