Andhra Pradesh High Court
WA/679/2009 of SRI CHENNAKESAVA SWAMY TEMPLE PRAKASAM DIST amp ANOTHER Vs BANDARU EDUKONDALU, PRAKASAM DIST. & 4 OTHERS on 27 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 679 of 2009 Bench Sr.No:-43 [3579] Sri Chennakesava Swamy Temple Prakasam Dist & Another and Others ...Appellant(s) Vs. Bandaru Edukondalu Prakasam Dist 4 Others and Others ...Respondent(s) ********** Advocate for Appellant: Mrs. Devi
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
APHC010371382009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
WRIT APPEAL NO: 679 of 2009 Bench Sr.No:-43
Sri Chennakesava Swamy Temple Prakasam Dist & Another and Others ...Appellant(s) Vs. Bandaru Edukondalu Prakasam Dist 4 Others and Others ...Respondent(s)
********** Advocate for Appellant: Mrs. Devi Subhashini Anne, SC For Endowments Advocate(s) for Respondent(s): AGP for Endowments
CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE LISA GILL SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA DATE : 28th April 2026 LISA GILL, CJ. Present appeal has been filed for setting aside order dated 19.03.2009 passed by learned Single Bench, whereby writ petition filed by respondent/writ petitioner was allowed and steps were directed to be taken to alienate land in question in his favour and permit him to till the land. Learned counsel for appellant submits that whereabouts of respondent/writ petitioner are not known; Possession of property in question was with appellant and has been given on lease to respondent No.3 in writ appeal and that no claim has been set forth by respondent/writ petitioner for
HCJ & NJS, J W.A. No:679 of 2009
transfer of land in question since long years. Therefore, proceedings in present writ appeal may be closed with liberty to appellant to file appropriate application in case any such claim is now raised. Proceedings are accordingly closed with liberty as aforementioned. No costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
LISA GILL, CJ
NINALA JAYASURYA, J
akn
HCJ & NJS, J W.A. No:679 of 2009
HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL, CHIEF JUSTICE & HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
Writ Appeal No:679 of 2009 DATE : 28.04.2026
AKN