Andhra Pradesh High Court
AS/1198/2018 of Bhimavarapu Basivi Reddy Vs Bhimavarapu Seetha Rami Reddy on 27 April 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3572] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI APPEAL SUIT NO: 1198/2018 Between:
APHC010517932018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
APPEAL SUIT NO: 1198/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. BHIMAVARAPU BASIVI REDDY, S/O. VEERA REDDY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, RETIRED DFO, R/O. PLOT NO.305, SESHADRI BLOCK, CAPITAL TOWERS, NEAR ANDHRA BANK, BYPASS ROAD, TADEPALLI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT AND
1. BHIMAVARAPU SEETHA RAMI REDDY, S/o. Sambireddy, Hindu, aged about 73 years, Cultivation and Business, R/o. Gudibandivaripalem, Kollipara Mandal, Guntur District.
...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant:
1. RAMINENI SUDHEER Counsel for the Respondent:
1. N SASIKALA
APPEAL SUIT NO: 1213/2018 Between:
1. BHIMAVARAPU BASIVI REDDY, PLOT NO.305, SESHADRI BLOCK, CAPITAL TOWERS, NEAR ANDHRA BANK, BYPASS ROAD, TADEPALLI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT
...APPELLANT AND
1. BHIMAVARAPU SEETHA RAMI REDDY, R/o. Gudibandivaripalem, Kollipara Mandal, Guntur District
...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant:
1. RAMINENI SUDHEER Counsel for the Respondent:
1. N SASIKALA
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI APPEAL SUIT No.1198 and 1213 of 2018 COMMON ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)
On 21.04.2026, this Court passed the following order.
“Learned counsel for the appellant has filed the separate memo (wrongly mentioned as learned counsel for the respondent).
2. A memorandum of compromise said to have been settled between the parties out of Court and the copy thereof has been annexed.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant in the appeals submits that those appeals be dismissed in view of the memorandum of compromise between the parties.
4. Learned counsel for the respondent in the appeals also submits that the settlement of compromise has taken place between the parties.
5. Let an appropriate applications be filed by the appellant.
6. List next week.”
2. Thereafter, a join withdrawal memo has been filed by both sides stating that the matter is settled out of the Court and therefore, the parties in both the appeals do not want to proceed any further and the appeals may be dismissed as withdrawn.
3. Recording the aforesaid, both the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________ JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
_________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
Date: 28.04.2026 Dvs
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
APPEAL SUIT No.1198 and 1213 of 2018 Date: 28.04.2026 Dvs