Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/3371/2026 of Sontena Ananda Prem Kumar Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 27 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3371/2026 Between: 1. SONTENA ANANDA PREM KUMAR, S/O L
APHC010221032026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
1. SONTENA ANANDA PREM KUMAR, S/O L PUNYARAO,AGED 30
YEARS,OCC HALTING DRIVER, R/O. HUKUMPETA V MASR
DISTRICT
R/O.
SUJATHA
NAGAR,CHINAMUSHIDIWADA,
PENDURTHY,VISAKHAPATNAM.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR,THROUGH THE SHO, G.MADUGULA PS,ALLURI
SEETHARAMA
RAJU
DISTRICT,HIGH
COURT
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH AT AMRAVATI
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS
praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to release the Petitioner/A-2 on bail in FIR No.49 of 2025 of G. Madugula Police Station, A.S.R. District on 05-12- 2025 on the terms and conditions Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. AMARENDRA JILLELLA
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition, under Sections 480 and 483 of the BNSS, has been filed by the Petitioner herein/Accused No.2, seeking regular bail, in Crime No.49/2025 of G.Madugula Police Station, Alluri Sitha Rama Raju District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 20(b)(ii)(C), 25 read with 8(c) of the NDPS Act.
2. This is the 2nd bail application. Earlier this Court dismissed the bail application filed by the petitioner vide order dated 19.02.2026 in Crl.P.No.1064of 2026.
3. Heard Sri Amarendra Jillella, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State.
4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner/Accused No. 2 is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the alleged offence. The petitioner is a part-time driver, working merely as a halting driver on a daily wage basis. He had no knowledge whatsoever of the alleged contraband said to have been recovered. The Petitioner is the sole breadwinner of his family, and his entire family is dependent upon his earnings for their livelihood. He has no criminal antecedents. The Petitioner has been in judicial custody since 05.12.2025. Learned counsel finally submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to furnish sufficient sureties to the satisfaction of the Court and to comply with any conditions imposed by this Court.
5. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the petition and would submit that there is no change of circumstances from the date of dismissal of the earlier bail application filed by the petitioner. She would further submit that the statutory period is not yet completed. Investigation is still pending. The contraband involved in the present case is in large quantity i.e., 80 kgs, which is a commercial quantity. She finally submits that the petition is liable to be dismissed.
5. Considering the nature and gravity of allegation levelled against the petitioner, his alleged role played in this case and there is no change of circumstances from the date of dismissal of the earlier bail application in Crl.P.No.1064 of 2026 dated 19.02.2026, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the Petitioner on bail at this stage.
6. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed.
__________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 28.04.2026. UPS
Dt.28.04.2026
UPS