Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/430/2016 of Sammeta Krishna Kumari, Vs The State of A.P., on 26 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 430/2016 Between: 1. SAMMETA KRISHNA KUMARI,, W/O SAMMETA
APHC010022102016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 430/2016
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SAMMETA KRISHNA KUMARI,, W/O SAMMETA GOWRISHANKARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O D.NO.41-1/5-90, INDRA COLONY, KRISHNALANKA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF AT HYDERABAD
2. SAMMETA GOWRI SANKARA RAO, S/O SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC: HELPER IN APSRTC, JAGGAIAHPET DEPOT, R/O KAKANI NAGAR, MAR GANDHI STATUE, JAGGAIAHPETA, KRISHNA DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased topleased to set aside and revise the judgment order dated 06-01-2016 in M.C. No.147/2011 on the file of the Family Court-cum-IV Additional District and Sessions Judge's Court at Vijayawada, Krishna District and pass such other order or orders as this Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. CHALLA AJAY KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
2. 4787/P NAGENDRA REDDY The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 430/2016 The Court made the following:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has expired.
The instant Criminal Revision Case has been preferred against the order of learned Jurisdictional Magistrate under Section 125 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. As the petitioner ie., wife has expired, nothing left in this Criminal Revision Case to decide.
Accordingly, the instant Criminal Revision case is disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
Dated:27.04.2026 SSA