Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/4139/2023 of TURAGA KUMARA RAMAM Vs M T KRISHNA BABU,I.A.S on 26 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4139/2023 Between: 1. TURAGA KUMARA RAMAM, S/O. VENKATACHALAM HINDU,

APHC010372922023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4139/2023

Between:

1. TURAGA

KUMARA

RAMAM,

S/O.

VENKATACHALAM

HINDU, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC. UN EMPLOYEE

R/O.D.NO.4-4-37/1,BUCHAMMA

AGRAHARAM

AMALAPURAM, DR.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, OLD EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

2. KATAKAM MOHAN RAO, S/O. DHANARAJU HINDU, AGED

ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC. UN EMPLOYEE RIO.D.NO.1-1

RAVULAPADU

VILLAGE,

RAVULAPALEM

MANDAL,

DR.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, OLD EAST

GODAVARI DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. M T KRISHNA BABU I A S, THE STATE OF ANDHRA

PRADESH REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HEALTH

MEDICAL

AND

FAMILY

WELFARE

DEPARTMENT,

SECRETARIAT,

VELAGAPUDI,

GUNTUR

DISTRICT,

ANDHRA PRADESH.

2. V RAMIREDDY, THE DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL AND

HEALTH

SERVICE

GOVT.

OF

ANDHRA

PRADESH,

GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

3. KRITIKA SHUKLA THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT (OLD EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

RONANKI RAMESH

4. THE

DISTRICT

MEDICAL

AND

HEALTH

OFFICER

KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT (OLD EAST GODAVARI

DISTRICT)

...CONTEMNOR(S):

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Honourable Court dated 07-07-2023 in W.P.No. 15179 of 2023 under Sec.10 to 12

Contempt of Courts Act, and pass such

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. V V PRABHAKARA RAO

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. VADAPALLI RAMESH

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

This contempt case is filed for non implementation of the order dated 07.07.2023, passed by this Court in W.P.No.15179 of 2023.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions submits that after filing the contempt case, the respondents have implemented the order dated 07.07.2023, passed by this Court in W.P.No.15179 of 2023 and hence he prays to close the contempt case.

3. Recording the same, the contempt case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH

Date:27.04.2026 GK

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH

CONTEMPT CASE NO:4139 of 2023

Dated:27.04.2026

GK

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead