Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/3754/2013 of B.RAMESH PATNAIK Vs THE SENIOR ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, AND 5 OTHERS on 23 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3754/2013 Between: 1. B.RAMESH PATNAIK, S/O. NAGABHUSHANA RAO, R/O.
APHC010685362013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3754/2013
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. B.RAMESH PATNAIK, S/O. NAGABHUSHANA RAO, R/O. FLAT NO. 3, BHASKAR SUVASA APARTMENTS, WALTAIR UPLANDS, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 003
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE SENIOR ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER AND 5 OTHERS, THA VYSYA BANK LIMITED REGD. & CORPORATE OFFICE 72, ST.MARK'S ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001.
2. THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER ER, HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENTS, THE VYSYA BANK LIMITED, REGD. & CORPORATE OFFICE.72, ST.MARK'S RAOD, BANGALORE - 560
001.
3. THE ENQUIRY OFFICER THE CHIEF MANAGER ER, THE VYSYA BANK LIMITED, REGD. & CORPORATE OFFICE, 72 ST.MARK'S ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001.
4. THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER HRD THE VYSYA BANK LIMITED, REGD & CORPORATE OFFICE, 72, ST. MARK'S ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001.
5. THE GENERAL MANAGER THE VYSYA BANK LIMITED, REGD. & CORPORATE OFFICE, 72, ST.MARK'S ROAD, BANGALORE - 560
001.
6. THE BRANCH MANAGER THE VYSYA BANK LIMITED, RAJAHMUNDRY BRANCH, 8-24-136, MAIN ROAD, P.B.NO. 39, RAJAHMUNDRY -1, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. A SRINIVASA SARMA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. G V S GANESH
2. C NIRANJAN RAO
The Court made the following ORDER :
On 10.04.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
2. Today, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner.
3. In view of the same, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________
JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date: 24.04.2026 Dvs
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3754 OF 2013 Dt: 24.04.2026 Dvs