Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/1102/2026 of DURGA PRASAD JAGARLAMUDI Vs S. CHENCHU KIRAN KUMAR on 23 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: Between: 1. DURGA PRASAD JAGARLAMUDI, S/O. LATE JAGARLAMUDI VASUDEVA PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/O.
APHC010186332026
IN T
(
FRIDAY, THE
TWO T
THE HONOURAB
CIVIL REV
Between:
1. DURGA
PRA
JAGARLAMUDI
YEARS, R/O.
PLOT
NO.
HYDERABAD -
2. VASUDEV
JA
JAGARLAMUDI
ATHENA C - 1
NAGAR, HYDE
3. NISHA PARIKH
39 YEARS,
PARADISE, SA
1. S CHENCHU
KRISHNAMA N
THANGELLAPA
BHAVANISANK
SUB-DISTRICT
THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
Special Original Jurisdiction)
E TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL
THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURY
VISION PETITION NO: 1102/2026
ASAD
JAGARLAMUDI,
S/O.
L
I VASUDEVA PRASAD, AGED ABOU
FLAT NO. 101, SRI SIRI APARTME
28,
SUNDER
NAGAR,
ERRAGAD
500 038.
AGARLAMUDI,
S/O.
DURGA
PRA
I, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,
101, LODHA CASA PARADISE, SAN
ERABAD - 500 18.
H, , D/O. JYOTHIN PARIKH, AGED AB
R/O. ATHENA C- 101, LODHA C
NATH NAGAR, HYDERABAD - 500 18
...PETITIONE
AND
KIRAN KUMAR, S/O. S. CHEN
AIDU, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O
ALEM
VILLA
KARAPURAM
POST,
THOTTAMB
T,
TIRUPATI
DISTRICT,
AND
YA
LATE
T 73
NTS,
DDA,
ASAD
R/O.
NATH
BOUT
CASA
.
ER(S)
CHU
O 1-7,
AGE,
BEDU
DHRA
NJS,J
C.R.P.NO.1102 OF 2026
PRADESH.
2. SATHYANARAYANA VINOD KUMAR, S/O RAMAIAH
SATYANARAYANA,
AGED
NOT
KNOWN
TO
THE
PLAINTIFF, R/O 468 13TH A CROSS VYALIKAVAL, MALLESWARAM BENGALURU , KARNATAKA 560003
3. SATHYANARAYANA BHARATH KUMAR, S/O RAMAIAH
SATYANARAYANA,
AGED
NOT
KNOWN
TO
THE
PLAINTIFF, R/O 468, 13TH A CROSS VYALIKAVAL, MALLESWARAM, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA 560003
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toPleased to allow this Civil Revision Petition by setting aside the Impugned Order dated 30.03.2026
passed by the Ld. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Srikalahasti, in lA No. 332 / 2026 in OS No. 16 / 2026, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of impugned order dated 30.03.2026 passed by the Ld. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Srikalahasti, in I.A No. 332/2026 in OS No. 16 / 2026 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the operation of the Impugned Order dated 30.03.2026 passed by the Ld. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Srikalahasti, in lA No. 332 /
2026 in OS No. 16 / 2026, and pass
NJS,J
C.R.P.NO.1102 OF 2026
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.VIMAL VARMA VASI REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.KANDERI CHETHAN
The Court made the following:
NJS,J
C.R.P.NO.1102 OF 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:-
Heard Mr.N.Subba Rao, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and also Mr.K.Chetan, learned counsel for the respondent No.1.
2. The present revision petition is filed against the order dated 30.03.2026 passed in I.A.No.332 of 2026 in O.S.No.16 of 2026 on the file of the Court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Srikalahasthi.
3. The said interlocutory application was filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of C.P.C by the respondent /plaintiff. The suit is filed seeking permanent injunction against the defendants etc., from in any manner interfering with the peaceful possession enjoyment of the plaintiff over the plaint schedule property including removing or attempting to remove the raw materials, herbal Agro-products (Herbal Pesticides, Fertilizers, weedicides etc.,) and other materials belonging to the plaintiff stored therein.
4. The learned senior counsel seeks to address arguments with reference to maintainability of the suit itself. However, taking note of the submission made by the learned counsel for the
NJS,J
C.R.P.NO.1102 OF 2026 respondent / plaintiff that in I.A.No.332 of 2026 counter has been filed and matter now stands posted to 29.04.2026. In view of the same, this Court is not inclined to examine the matter on merits.
5. However, taking into consideration the urgency expressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner and as it is stated by the learned counsel for the respondent / plaintiff that they are also ready to co-operate with the disposal of I.A.No.332 of 2026, this court without expressing any opinion on the merits, deems it fit to dispose of the revision petition, providing that learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) shall make an endeavor to dispose of the said interlocutory application, in accordance with law after giving due opportunity to the concerned parties as expeditiously as possible.
No costs.
___________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
24.04.2026 GRL Note: CC by two days.
NJS,J
C.R.P.NO.1102 OF 2026
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
C.R.P. No.1102 of 2026
24.04.2026 GRL Note: CC by two days.
NJS,J
C.R.P.NO.1102 OF 2026