Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/11258/2026 of Geddam Vijay Sunder Vs Union of India, on 23 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 11258/2026 Between: 1. GEDDAM VIJAY SUNDER, S/O GEDDAM VIJAY HARSHA KUMAR, AGED 36
APHC010223492026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
WRIT PETITION NO: 11258/2026
Between:
1. GEDDAM VIJAY SUNDER, S/O GEDDAM VIJAY HARSHA
KUMAR, AGED 36 YEARS. OCCUPATION BUSINESS, R/O. 23- 1-14/3, LB.
SASTRY
ROAD,
MUNICIPAL
COLONY
RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT-533 105
...PETITIONER
AND
1. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, CPV AND
OVERSEAS INDIAN AFFAIRS MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL
AFFAIRS, SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110011.
2. THE PASSPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS CHIEF
PASSPORT
OFFICER,
PSP
DIVISION,
MINISTRY
OF
EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, ROOM NO.8, PATIALA HOUSE, NEW
DELHI-110001
3. THE REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICE, REP BY ITS REGIONAL
PASSPORT OFFICER, NEAR P.F. OFFICE, BESIDE RYTHU
BAZAR,
MARRIPALEM
VUDA
LAYOUT,
NAD
POST,
VISAKHAPATNAM-530 00
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus a) To declare the action of Respondent No.3/Regional Passport Officer, Visakhapatnam in not re-issuing the passport of the petitioner bearing NO.Z3749282 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the law laid down by the Honble Apex Court, other High Courts and violative of Articles 14 and 19 of the
Constitution
of
India
b)
To
declare
the
letter
Ref.No.
SCN/1054683731/26, dated 21-04-2026 issued by the 3rd respondent as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the law and set aside the same c)
Consequently direct Respondent No.3/Regional Passport Officer, Visakhapatnam to re issue the passport to the petitioner, without reference to P.R.C. 16/2018 pending on the file of 3rd Addl.Judicial First Class Magistrate, Rajahmundry or criminal cases before court and IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct Respondent Authorities to consider the application of the petitioner for reissuing passport of the petitioner, without reference to PRC NO. 16/2018 pending on the file of 3RD Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Rajahmundry, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. MALLAVOLU NIKITHA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. Kumbhajadala Kaushi (Central Government Counsel)
The Court made the following:
WRIT PETITION No.11258 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER: -
It is brought to the notice of this Court by both the learned counsel that the subject matter of this writ petition is squarely covered by the common order passed by this Court in W.P.No.5769 of 2026 and batch, dated 07.04.2026, which is as follows: “9. Accordingly, these writ petitions are allowed with the following direction: The Passport Authorities to consider and pass appropriate orders on the applications submitted by the petitioners for issuance of passports or re-issuance of passports or renewal of passports, for a period of ten (10) years, under Section 10 of the Passports Act, 1967 and under Rule 12 of Passport Rules, 1980 and also the Gazette Notification issued by the Central Government vide GSR No.570(E), dated 25.08.1993, without reference to the criminal proceedings pending against the petitioners before the concerned Courts, subject to the following conditions:
(i) The petitioners shall submit an undertaking, along with an affidavit affirming that he/she will not leave the country during the pendency of the criminal proceedings, pending against them without permission of the courts having jurisdiction and that he/she will co- operate with concerned trial court in concluding the proceedings.
(ii) On filing such an undertaking as well as affidavit, the concerned trial court shall issue a certified copy of the same within two
(02) weeks.
(iii) The petitioners shall submit the certified copy of the aforesaid undertaking before the respondent-Passport Officer for issuance of passport or re-issuance or renewal of his/her passport.
(iv) The respondent-Passport Officer shall consider the said application in the light of the observations made by this Court herein as well as the contents of the undertaking given by the petitioners for issuance of passport or re-issuance or renewal of his/her passport in accordance with law, within two (02) weeks from the date of said application.
(v) On renewal of the passport, the petitioners shall deposit the original renewed Passport before the concerned trial court.
(vi) The petitioners shall file an application before the concerned trial Court seeking permission to travel abroad.
(vii) The concerned trial Court shall consider the same, in accordance with law.”
2. Hence, following the said orders, this writ petition is allowed on the same terms.
3. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
Date : 24.04.2026 PGR
W.P.No.11258 of 2026
Date: 24.04.2026
PGR