Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/8248/2026 of BASA NAGVENI Vs THE UNION OF INDIA on 23 April 2026
of 2026 Basa Nagveni Vs The Union Of India & Others Present:- Mr. Pala Karthi Kiran, advocate for appellant. Mr. M. Vinodin Ruth, advocate, appeared for respondent No.3. Mr. Adithya Harsha Vardhan, Advocate representing Law Firm, for respondent No.4. ****** On 30.04.2026, or, if not
APHC010159182026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 8248 of 2026
Bench Sr.No:-
Basa Nagveni
...Petitioner
Vs.
The Union Of India and Others
...Respondent(s)
CORAM:- HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE LISA GILL
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
DATE:- 24th APRIL 2026
Present:-
Mr. Pala Karthi Kiran, advocate for petitioner.
Mr. M. Vinodin Ruth, advocate, appeared for
respondent No.3.
Mr. Adithya Harsha Vardhan, Advocate representing
Law Firm, for respondent No.4.
**********
LISA GILL,J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that I.A.No.536 of 2026 in S.A.No.665 of 2025 is pending before learned Debts Recovery Tribunal (for brevity “DRT”), Visakhapatnam, but the matter is being repeatedly adjourned without any decision on the interim relief(s) being sought. It is in this situation, present petition has been filed.
2. Petitioner, it is submitted, bought house in question in the year 2016 and mortgaged the same with Syndicate Bank (now merged as Canara Bank) and is regularly paying installments. It is submitted that petitioner was shocked to receive a notice memo dated 08.10.2025 from advocate commissioner in Crl.M.P.No.198 of 2025.
3. Learned counsel for respondent No.4-Canara Bank verifies that petitioner has availed of loan facility and is regularly paying installments.
4. During course of arguments, consensus has been arrived at between parties that this matter be decided by learned DRT on its merits thereof. It is submitted that no adjournment shall be sought by any of the parties, though learned counsel for respondents submits that the matter be decided in a time bound manner.
5. Keeping in view the consensus arrived at between parties as above, it is directed that pending S.A.No.665 of 2025 or at least the application seeking interim relief be decided by learned
DRT on 30.04.2026, and if not possible on the said date, then definitely within a period of two (02) weeks thereafter. It is clarified that there shall be no extension of such interim relief automatically.
6. Learned counsel for central Bank fairly states that no coercive steps shall be taken till then.
7. Writ Petition is, accordingly disposed of with no expression of opinion on merits of the matter. No order as to costs. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of accordingly.
(LISA GILL) JUDGE
(NINALA JAYASURYA) JUDGE
Date: 24.04.2026 ANS
HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE LISA GILL HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION NO: 8248 of 2026
Date: 24.04.2026 ANS