Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/3065/2026 of G Subba Reddy Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 23 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3065/2026 Between: 1. G SUBBA REDDY, S/O. G. CHENGAL REDDY, AGED 64
APHC010204342026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
1. G SUBBA REDDY, S/O. G. CHENGAL REDDY, AGED 64 YEARS,R/O.
D.NO. 18-1-69/A, UT FLOOR, YASHODA NAGAR,K.T. ROAD, OPP.
SABSON SUPER MARKET, TIRUPATI URBAN,P.O. TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS
PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR,HIGH
COURT
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH,THROUGH TIRUPATI WEST POLICE STATION,TIRUPATI
DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS
praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioner/Accused no. 2 in the event of his arrest in Crime No. 157 of 2025
on the file of the Tirupati West Police Station, Tirupati District and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. SHAIK AFZAL MOHAMMED
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER :
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Shaik Afzal Mohammed, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with a liberty to file a fresh petition as and when required.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing on behalf of the State is in attendance.
4. In that view of the matter, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh petition as and when required.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed.
___________________________________
DR.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 24.04.2026. UPS
Dt: 24.04.2026
UPS