Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/5556/2023 of CH. PRASAD Vs SRI A.S. DINESH KUMAR on 23 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5556/2023 Between: 1. CH. PRASAD, S/O. CH. RAGHAVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O. CHEJERLA VILLAGE, ONGOLE MANDAL,
APHC010506842023
IN T
(
FRIDAY,THE
TWO T
THE HONOURAB
CONT
Between:
1. CH. PRASAD, S
YEARS, R/O. C
PRAKSAM DIST
1. SRI A S DIN
PRAKASAM DIS
2. SRI V VISWE
OFFICER, ONG
3. SRI P MURAL
DISTRICT
Petition under S
1971 praying that in
herein the High Cour
herein for the willful,
Dt.08.11.2022 of this
and pass
THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
Special Original Jurisdiction)
E TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL
THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURY
TEMPT CASE NO: 5556/2023
S/O. CH. RAGHAVAIAH, AGED ABOU
CHEJERLA VILLAGE, ONGOLE MAN
TRICT.
...PETITIO
AND
NESH KUMAR, DISTRICT COLLECT
STRICT, ONGOLE.
ESWARA RAO, REVENUE DIVISIO
GOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
LI, TAHSILDAR, ONGOLE, PRAKA
...CONTEMNOR
Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court
the circumstances stated in the affidav
rt may be pleased to punish .the respon
deliberate and wanton violation of the o s Hon'ble Court made in W.P.No.36135/
YA
UT 55
DAL,
ONER
TOR,
ONAL
ASAM
R(S):
s Act
vit file
ndent
rders
/2022
NJS,J
C.C.NO.5556 of 2023
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.V S K RAMA RAO
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1.NARASIMHA REDDY. G . L
The Court made the following:
NJS,J
C.C.NO.5556 of 2023
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:-
The learned counsel for the petitioner appearing through online states that, in view of subsequent developments, the cause in Contempt Case does not survive for adjudication.
2. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. However, the petitioner may avail the remedies against the orders passed by the District Collector, in accordance with law. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
24.04.2026 GRL
NJS,J
C.C.NO.5556 of 2023
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5556 of 2023
24.04.2026 GRL
NJS,J
C.C.NO.5556 of 2023