Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/2362/2013 of G. SRINIVASULU, KURNOOL Vs KAPIL CHIT FUNDS PVT., KURNOOL & 4 OTHRS on 23 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2362/2013 Between: 1. G. SRINIVASULU, KURNOOL, S/O. PENCHALAIAH OCC:
APHC010562852013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2362/2013
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. G. SRINIVASULU, KURNOOL, S/O. PENCHALAIAH OCC: RECORD ASSISTANT PANCHAYAT RAJ ZILLA PARISAD COMPOUND KURNOOL
...PETITIONER AND
1. KAPIL CHIT FUNDS PVT KURNOOL 4 OTHRS, REGISTERED THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 3-1- 631, VIJAYA RAGHU NANDANA NAGAR, HAVING BRANCHES ALL OVER THE STATE OF A.P., AND ON OF SUCH BRANCH AT KURNOOL, REP. BY ITS RECOVERY MANAGER N.G. CHAKRAPANI
2. B ABRAHAM, S/O. B. SUNDER RAO OCC: RMP DOCTOR R/O. H.NO. 77-206-34A VENKATACHALAPATHI NAGAR KALLUR KURNOOL
3. B PRABUDAS, S/O. B. SUNDER RAO OCC: LAB ASSISTANT Z.P. HIGH SCHOOL PAMULAPADU VILLAGE KURNOOL DISTRICT
4. M CHINNA MADDILETY, S/O. LAKSHMANNA OCC: LIC AGENT R/O. H.NO. 83/174 SHAREEN NAGAR KURNOOL
5. P NARASIMHA RAO, S/O. P. PENCHALAIAH OCC: ATTENDER R/O.H.NO. 39/37 UPSTAIRS BAPUJI NAGAR KURNOOL R2 TO R5 NOT NECESSARY PARTY TO THIS PETITION
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. J JANAKIRAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. P VISHNUVARDHANA REDDY
2. SIREESHA RANI VALLABHANENI
The Court made the following ORDER :
It is represented by the learned counsel on either side that the E.P., proceedings itself were terminated and no E.P., is pending, as such, no further orders are required to be passed.
2. In view the same, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________
JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date: 24.04.2026 Dvs
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2362 OF 2013 Dt: 24.04.2026 Dvs