Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/11242/2026 of PONNADA SUNITHA Vs THE STATE OF AP on 23 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 11242/2026 Between: 1. PONNADA SUNITHA, D/O. BRAHMAJI, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, WORKING AS

APHC010222892026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH

WRIT PETITION NO: 11242/2026

Between:

1. PONNADA SUNITHA, D/O. BRAHMAJI, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, WORKING

AS

H.DEPUTY

TAHSILDAR,

O/O.

TAHSILDAR,

KOTHAVALASA VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF AP, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE

DEPARTMENT,

SECRETARIAT,

VELAGAPUDI,

AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE

CHIEF

COMMISSIONER

OF

LAND

ADMINISTRATION,

GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR

DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not considering the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Tahsildar on regular basis, even though he is eligible and qualified, on the ground that a I.D. Charge Memo vide G.O.Rt.No.422 Revenue (Vigilance-Ill)

Department dated 17-03-2026 is issued and enquiry is pending, in spite of the fact, the allegations are of the year 2020-2021 and are in minor lapses, as arbitrary, illegal, in violation of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Tahsildar on regular basis in terms of G.O.Ms.NO.257 General Administration (Ser-C) Department dated 10-6-1999

without reference to pendency of disciplinary proceedings and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Tahsildar on regular basis in terms of G.O.Ms.No.257 General Administration (Ser-C) Department dated 10-6-1999 without reference to pendency of disciplinary proceedings pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. SUBBA RAO KORRAPATI

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR SERVICES I

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

This writ petition is filed for the following relief:

“…to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not considering the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Tahsildar on regular basis, even though he is eligible and qualified, on the ground that a 5 ID Charge Memo vide G.O.Rt.No.422 Revenue (Vigilance-Ill) Department dated 17-03-2026 is issued and enquiry is pending, in spite of the fact, the allegations are of the year 2020-2021 and are in minor lapses, as arbitrary, illegal, in violation of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Tahsildar on regular basis in terms of G.O.Ms.No.257 General Administration (Ser-C) Department dated 10-6-1999 without reference to pendency of disciplinary proceedings and pass…”

2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Government Pleader for respondents.

3. A charge memo vide G.O.Rt.No.422, Revenue (Vigilance-III) Department dated 17.03.2026 was issued to the petitioner framing charges. The petitioner submitted a written explanation on 16.04.2026 requesting the respondent-authorities to consider her case for promotion in view of G.O.Ms.No.257 dated 10.06.1999 taking into consideration the initiation of enquiry and the timing of issuance of the charge memo which was issued before promotions.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the respondents have not considered the case of the petitioner for promotion, despite her seniority and clean service record.

5. Learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, on instructions, submits that it is an admitted fact that the petitioner was shown in the seniority list and she will be considered for promotion, if she is otherwise eligible.

6. Having heard the respective submissions, this Court is of the opinion that the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Tahsildar, on regular basis can be considered in terms of G.O.Ms.No.257, dated 10.06.1999.

7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to consider the petitioner’s case for promotion to the post of Tahsildar on regular basis subject to the petitioner possessing requisite qualifications in terms of G.O.Ms.No.257, General Administration (Ser.C) Department, dated 10.06.1999 and also conclude the enquiry, if any pending, in terms of G.O.Ms.No.91, General Administration (Ser.C) Department, dated 12.09.2022, within a period of six (06) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall cooperate for expeditious completion of the enquiry. In the event of failure to conclude the enquiry within the aforesaid time frame, the disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner shall stand quashed without further reference to this Court. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

_____________ D. RAMESH, J Date: 24.04.2026 M K K

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH

WRIT PETITION No: 11242 of 2026

Date: 24.04.2026

M K K

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead