Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/2528/2019 of Venumbaka Hari Vs THE STATE OF AP on 22 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 2528/2019 Between: 1. VENUMBAKA HARI, S/O KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC

APHC010056042019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 2528/2019

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. VENUMBAKA HARI, S/O KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O D.NO.4-1-22/A, KONAMA THOTTA STREET, KOVUR VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF STAMP AND REGISTRATION, AP SECRETARIAT, VALAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, STAMP AND REGISTRATIONS, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, inaction of the 2nd respondent in not considering the petitioner representation dated 4-1-2019, requesting him to exercise his powers under section 33 of Indian Stamps Act, 1899 for impounding the deed of exchange, dated 29-7-2000 is being illegal, arbitrary and in violation of the principles of natural justices and offends Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to impound the deed of exchange, dated 29-7-2000 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner representation, dated 4-1- 2019 for impounding the deed of exchange, dated 29-7-2000 pending disposal of the main writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. PAVANI SIVA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP)

The Court made the following ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioner filed Court slip dated 22.04.2026 before this Court, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.

Permission is accorded.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 23.04.2026

RSD

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 2528/2019

Dated: 23.04.2026 RSD

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead