Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/800/2019 of M S CHANDRA RAO Vs THE STATE OF A P on 22 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 800/2019 Between: 1. M S CHANDRA RAO, S/O.VENKATESU, AGE. 41
APHC010215842019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
1. M
S
CHANDRA
RAO,
S/O.VENKATESU,
AGE.
YEARS,
PREVIOUSLY WORKED AS VRO, JEELUGUMILLI AND W.G.DIST
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF A P, REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT
BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI
...RESPONDENT
Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to memorandum of grounds before this Hon’ble court against the order passed in Crl.M.P. 734/2019 in Cc. 223/2006
on the file of the court of the II Additional Judicial first class magistrate, Eluru, dated 20-5-2019
IA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioner in Cc 223/2006 on the file of the court of the II Additional Judicial first class magistrate, Eluru pending the criminal revision case Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. NARAM NAGESWARA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Naram Nageswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner appeared through Video Conference and would submit that no further orders are required in this matter and the revision may be closed.
2. Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State is in attendance.
3. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Revision Case is closed.
Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 23.04.2026. UPS
Dt.23.04.2026
UPS