Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/6996/2017 of Erla Brahmaiah Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh rep by its PrI Secretary, on 22 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 6996/2017 Between: 1. ERLA BRAHMAIAH, S/O. E. MALAKONDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
APHC010641022017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3207]
THURSDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
WRIT PETITION NO: 6996/2017
Between:
1. ERLA BRAHMAIAH, S/O. E. MALAKONDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55
YEARS
OCC.
APSRTC
EMPLOYEE,
R/O.
D
NO.
2-41/1
LINGASAMUDRAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT
2. ERLA SHIVAIAH @ SHIVA KRISHNA, S/O. E. BRAHMAIAH, AGED
ABOUT 33 YEARS OCC. PRIVATE SERVICE R/O. D NO. 2-41/1
LINGASAMUDRAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL PRAKASHAM DISTRICT
3. ERLA HARI KRISHNA,, S/O. E. BRAHMAIAH AGED ABOUT 35
YEARS,
OCC.
PRIVATE
SERVICE
R/O.
D
NO.
2-41/1,
LINGASAMUDRAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRI SECRETARY, HOME
DEPARTMENT
VELAGAPUDI,
AMARAVATHI,
GUNTUR
DISTRICT
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE KRISHNA DISTRICT, AT
MACHILIPATNAM
3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MARKAPURAM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER LINGASAMUDRAM POLICE
STATION, LINGASAMUDRAM PRAKASAM DISTRICT
5. SMT PAMULA KRISHNAVENI, W/O. LNAGANTI BHAVANI SANKAR, AGED 42 YEARS OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. AMEDKAR NAGAR, KAVALI, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, AP
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the registration of the FIR No. 2/2017 dated 17.01.2017 under section 379, 409, 506, 468 r/w 34 of 1PC and Section 3CI
(1) (r) (II) Iva) of SC/ST (POA) Act by the 4th respondent against the petitioner basing on the complaint of the 5th respondent is nothing but illegal, arbitrary and abuse of process of law and to quash the same in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 8595 OF 2017
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in FIR No. 2/2017 dated 17.01.2017
registered by the SHO, Lingasamudram Police Station, Prakasham District, pending disposal of the main writ petition, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. N RAVI PRASAD
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
WRIT PETITION NO.6996 OF 2017
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that in view of the subsequent developments happened during pendency of this Writ Petition, nothing survives in this Writ Petition for further adjudication and sought to dismiss the Writ Petition as infructuous.
2. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
3. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
Dated: 23.04.2026 TM
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
WRIT PETITION NO: 6996 of 2017
Dated: 23.04.2026 TM