Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/31196/2024 of B MASTAN VALLI Vs THE STATE OF AP on 22 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 31196/2024 Between: 1. B MASTAN VALLI, S/O MASTHAN, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, S.G. TEACHER,
APHC010596262024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO: 31196/2024
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. B MASTAN VALLI, S/O MASTHAN, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, S.G. TEACHER, M.P.P.S. DURGAPURAM, S.T. COLONY,
NANDALUR MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. (PETITIONER)
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, STATE OF A.P., AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, RAYACHOTY, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 2nd respondent herein with regard to initiating further action in pursuant to letter in Rc.No.3712/6437/ A3/C1/2022 dt.27.6.2022 addressed by the 3rd respondent to the 2nd respondent herein for regulation of interregnum period from the date of suspension w.e.f.17.12.2013 till the date of reinstatement i.e., 27.8.2021 by further declaring the inaction as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of rights guaranteed under Article 14, 16, 21 and 300-A of the constitution of India and pass petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent herein with regard to initiating further action in pursuant to letter in Rc.No.3712/6437/A3/C1/2022 dt.27.6.2022
addressed by the 3rd respondent to the 2nd respondent herein for regulation of interregnum period from the date of suspension w.e.f.17.12.2013 till the date of reinstatement i.e., 27.8.2021 pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the proposed respondent as respondent No.4 in W.P.No. 31196 of 2024 in the interest of justice and to pass petition, the High Court may be pleased to amend the prayer of the writ petition is as follows: old prayer:- ''to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring the inaction of 2nd respondent herein with regard to initiating further action in pursuant to letter in Rc.No 3712/6437/A3/C1/2022 dt. 27.6.2022 addressed by the 3rd respondent to the 2nd respondent herein for regulation of interregnum period from the date of suspension w.e.f.17.12.2013 till the date of reinstatement i.e., 27.8.2021 by further declaring the inaction as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of rights guaranteed under Article 14,16, 21 and 300-A of the constitution of India" New Prayer:- ''to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 4th respondent herein with regard to initiating further action in pursuant to Suspension Proceedings vide Rc.No.3712/ 6437/A3/2013, dated 12.02.2018 (suspension period on 17.01.2018 to 01.11.2018) and also erroneously passed the dismissal proceedings vide Rc.No.3712/6347/A3/2018, dated 02.11.2018 (dismissal period 02.11.2018 to 27.08.2021), falsely implicated the case in Crime No.68/2013, by directing the respondents more particularly respondent No.4 to regularize of above suspension period and to pay the arrears and other allowance to the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of rights guaranteed under Article 14, 16, 21 and 300-A of the constitution of India and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PASAPALA SUDHAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES III
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 31196 of 2024 The Court made the following Order:
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition and also addressed a Letter dated 16.04.2026 to the Registrar (Judicial) to that effect.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh Writ Petition, if so advised. There shall be no order as to costs.
Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.
__________________ JUSTICE D RAMESH Date: 23.04.2026 PSA