Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/10829/2026 of Vidavalum Raj Kumar, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 22 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 10829/2026 Between: 1. VIDAVALUM RAJ KUMAR,, S/O. LATE VENKATA SUBBAIAH, AGED
APHC010194762026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
WRIT PETITION NO: 10829/2026
Between:
1. VIDAVALUM RAJ KUMAR,, S/O. LATE VENKATA SUBBAIAH, AGED
ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCCU. UNEMPLOYED, R/O. HARAJANAWADA, GANGAVARAAM, KOVURU, S.P.S.R. NELLORE DISTRICT - 524137.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522503.
2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH, OFFICE OF THE DGP, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT -
522503.
3. THE
SUPERINTENDENT
OF
POLICE,
S.P.S.R.
NELLORE
DISTRICT, NELLORE - 524001.
4. THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS
REGIONAL
DIRECTOR,
ANDHRA
PRADESH,
6-1-56,
SECRETARIAT ROAD, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD - 500004.
5. HDFC BANK LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING
DIRECTOR, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT HDFC BANK
HOUSE, SENAPATI BAPAT MARG, LOWER PAREL (WEST), MUMBAI-400013.
6. SBI CARDS AND PAYMENT SERVICES LIMITED, REPRESENTED
BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, HAVING ITS REGISTERED
OFFICE AT UNIT 401-402, 4TH FLOOR, TOWER-A, DLF CYBER
GREENS, DLF PHASE-III, GURUGRAM, HARYANA - 122002.
7. YES
BANK
LIMITED,
REPRESENTED
BY
ITS
MANAGING
DIRECTOR, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT YES BANK
HOUSE, OFF WESTERN EXPRESS HIGHWAY, SANTACRUZ
EAST, MUMBAI-400055.MAHARASTRA.
8. RBL
BANK
LIMITED,
REPRESENTED
BY
ITS
MANAGING
DIRECTOR, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 1ST LINE, SHAHUPURI, KOLHAPUR - 416001, MAHARASHTRA.
9. AXIS BANK LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS
MANAGING
DIRECTOR, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT AXIS HOUSE, C-,WADIA INTERNATIONAL CENTRE, PANDURANG BUDHKAR
MARG, WORLI, MUMBAI - 400025.
10. SOCIAL WORTH TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED FIBE LOAN, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, HAVING ITS REGISTERED
OFFICE AT UNIT NO. 404, THE CHAMBERS, VIMAN NAGAR, PUNE - 411014, MAHARASHTRA.
11. PREFF DREAMPLUG TECHNOLOGIES, REPRESENTED BY ITS
MANAGER, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 2ND FLOOR, BLOCK 2, MY HOME HUB, HITECH CITY ROAD, HITEC CITY, HYDERABAD - 500081, TELANGANA.
12. IDFC FIRST BANK LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING
DIRECTOR, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT KRM TOWERS, 7TH FLOOR, NO.L, HARRINGTON ROAD, CHETPET, CHENNAI -
600031.
13. INDUSIND BANK LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING
DIRECTOR, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 2401, GENERAL THIMAYYA ROAD, (KOREGAON PARK ANNEX), PUNE-
411001.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order, or Direction, particularly in the nature of Mandamus, directing the Respondent Authorities to take immediate cognizance of the complaints made by the Petitioner and initiate appropriate
action against Respondent Banks Nos. 5 to 13 and their recovery agents for their illegal and coercive recovery practices in violation of the RBI Master Circular on Fair Practices Code, to direct Respondent Banks Nos. 5 to 13 and their recovery agents to cease and desist from all forms of harassment, intimidation, threats, and coercive recovery methods forthwith, to ensure that the recovery agents of Respondent Banks Nos. 5 to 13 strictly comply with the RBI Master Circular dated 12.08.2022 and all other applicable guidelines, to award appropriate compensation to the Petitioner for the severe mental agony, harassment, and violation of his fundamental rights caused by the actions of Respondent Banks Nos. 5 to 13 and the inaction of the public authorities and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to restrain Respondent Banks Nos. 5 to 13, their officers, recovery agents, representatives, or any person acting on their behalf, from making any threatening phone calls, visiting the residence of the Petitioner, or engaging in any form of intimidation, harassment. or coercive recovery action against the Petitioner, and further be pleased to direct Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 to ensure compliance with the said restraint order and to take immediate action to prevent any further harassment of the Petitioner by the recovery agents of Respondent Banks Nos. 5 to 13, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. MOHAN RAO M
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
WRIT PETITION NO.10829 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material available on record.
2. In an identical circumstances, this Court by order dated 17.03.2026 in W.P.No.7435 of 2026 issued the following directions: “8. For the aforesaid reasons and as the procedure adopted by the respondents for recovery of loan amount from the petitioner, amounts to violation of the rights guaranteed under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the respondents, to ensure that the agents engaged by them for recovery of the loan amounts, shall strictly follow the guidelines and instructions issued by the Reserve Bank of India and also the judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in ICICI Bank Ltd. vs. Prakash Kaur’s case (1 supra) and ICICI Bank vs. Shanti Devi Sharma’s case (2 supra).
9. In view of the foregoing discussion, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the respondents, to ensure that the agents engaged by them for recovery of the loan amounts shall strictly adhere to the guidelines and instructions issued by the 2nd respondent and as hold by the Hon’ble Apex Court as stated supra.
10. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.”
3. Accordingly, by following the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of with the following direction: Respondents are directed to ensure that the agents engaged by them for recovery of the loan amounts shall strictly adhere to the guidelines and instructions issued by the 4th respondent and as held by the Hon’ble Apex Court.
4. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in this case, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
Date:23.04.2026 SA
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
WRIT PETITION NO.10829 of 2026
Dt.23.04.2026 SA