Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/5994/2007 of MOHAMMAD OBAIDULLAH KHALEEL, KARIMNAGAR DIST. Vs A.P. VAIDYA VIDHANA PARISHAD, HYDERABAD & 3 OTHERS on 22 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE WRIT PETITION NO: 5994/2007 Between: 1. MOHAMMAD OBAIDULLAH KHALEEL, KARIMNAGAR DIST., S/O. A.Q.M. SAMIULLAH, PHYSIOTHERAPIST H.NO. 5 AHMEDPURA, KARIMNAGAR,
APHC010440662007
IN TH
THURSDAY
TWO
THE HONOURABLE SR
THE HONOURAB
W
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. MOHAMMAD OBA A.Q.M. SAMIULL AHMEDPURA, KAR
1. A P VAIDYA VID HYDERABAD.
2. THE DISTRICT ME KARIMNAGAR DIST
3. THE DISTRICT KARIMNAGAR, KAR
4. THE MEDICAL S HOSPITAL, KARIM Petition under Articl circumstances stated in pleased to issue a writ, o Certiorari calling for Reco the file of A.P. Administr further declare that to c E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Y, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APR O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT RI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVEND BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR G RIT PETITION NO: 5994/2007 AIDULLAH KHALEEL, KARIMNAGAR LAH, PHYSIOTHERAPIST H.N RIMNAGAR, KARIMNAGAR DISTRICT AND DHANA PARISHAD HYDERABAD EDICAL AND HEALTH OFFICER K TRICT. COORDINATOR OF HOSPITAL RIMNAGAR DISTRICT. UPERINTENDENT DISTRICT HEA NAGAR. ...RES le 226 of the Constitution of India pra the affidavit filed therewith, the High order or direction especially one in the ords pertaining to OA No. 96 of 2007 rative Tribunal, Hyderabad and quash call for the records relating to and DESH
RIL DRANATH ROY GEDELA R DIST., S/O. NO. 5-3-110, T. ...PETITIONER 3 OTHERS, KARIMNAGAR, L SERVICES, ADQUARTERS, SPONDENT(S): aying that in the h Court may be nature of writ of dt. 5-3-2007 on h the same and connected with
Notification No. 1/2006 issued by 2nd Respondent and quash or set aside the same if necessary by holding the order in Rc No. E1/4027/2005-06 dt. 2-11- 2006 of the 4th Respondent as void, illegal, and consequently to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as Physiotherapist with all consequential benefits pass such order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WVMP 1460 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 9-4-2007 in WPMP No. 7663/2007 in WP No. 5994/2007 and pass such other order or orders IA NO: 2 OF 2007(WVMP 1585 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders passed in WPMP No. 7663/2007 in WP No. 5994/2007 dt. 9-4-2007 and to dismiss the writ petition as it is devoid of merits in the interest of justice. IA NO: 3 OF 2007(WPMP 7663 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner into service in terms of Orders dt. 18-1-2007 passed by them by suspending the operation of the orders of the of A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad dt. 5-3-2007 in OA No. 96/2007 and batch pending disposal of the writ petition and pass such other order or orders IA NO: 4 OF 2007(WPMP 10251 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner herein to implead herself as 5th respondent to the Writ Petition and pass suchfurther or other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M SURENDER RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. S A WAHEED SHABAZ
2. V HARI HARAN
3. GP FOR SERVICES I
The Court made the following: ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner in this old writ petition of the year 2007, when the matter is taken up for hearing today.
2. Therefore, it is evident that the petitioner is not evincing interest to pursue this writ petition.
3. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
_____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
Date: 23.04.2026 MDP