Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/15116/2023 of SINGAREDDY HANIMI REDDY Vs KARUR VYSYA BANK LIMITED on 22 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT PETITION NO: 15116 of 2023 Bench Sr.No:- 18 [3575] Singareddy Hanimi Reddy ...Petitioner Vs. Karur Vysya Bank Limited and Others ...Respondent(s) ********** CORAM:- HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE LISA GILL HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA DATE:-
APHC010293342023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 15116 of 2023
Bench Sr.No:-
Singareddy Hanimi Reddy
...Petitioner
Vs.
Karur Vysya Bank Limited and Others
...Respondent(s)
**********
CORAM:- HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE LISA GILL
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
DATE:- 23rd APRIL 2026
Present:-
Mr. T. Lakshmi Narayana, Advocate for petitioner,
appeared through virtual mode.
Mr. P. Rajesh Babu, Advocate for respondent Nos.1
& 2.
None for respondent No.3.
**********
LISA GILL,J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This Writ Petition has been filed primarily challenging proceedings under Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial
Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for brevity “SARFAESI Act”), undertaken by respondent Bank against respondent No.3 (borrower). It is further prayed that action of bank, in refusing to receive a cheque issued by petitioner for discharging of debt, should be declared illegal.
2. It had been pointed out by learned counsel for respondent Bank that present petitioner lacks bonafides. It is submitted that petitioner has filed O.S.No.1846 of 2022 against respondent seeking recovery for an amount of Rs.20,00.000/- and on the other hand, has filed present writ petition.
3. As none had been appearing on behalf of petitioner on various occasions, following order was passed on 21.04.2026. “None had appeared on behalf of petitioner on last date of hearing. The matter was adjourned for today with an observation that in case, there is no representation on behalf of petitioner and arguments are not addressed, the petition may be dismissed in default and for non-prosecution. Today again, there is no representation on behalf of petitioner. In the interest of justice, matter is adjourned to 23.04.2026 under the caption „for dismissal‟.”
4. Today, Mr. T. Lakshmi Narayana, learned counsel, appears on behalf of petitioner and submits that despite various efforts, petitioner has not contacted him and he therefore pleads no instructions in this matter.
5. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances as above, and specific stand of learned counsel for petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No order as to costs.
6. Pending applications, if any, are disposed of accordingly.
(LISA GILL) JUDGE
(NINALA JAYASURYA) JUDGE
Date: 23.04.2026 ANS
HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE LISA GILL HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION NO: 15116 of 2023
Date: 23.04.2026 ANS