Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/10774/2026 of MODUPALLI RAVI KUMAR Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 21 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 10774/2026 Between: 1. MODUPALLI RAVI KUMAR, S/O. LATE VENKATA RAMUDU, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 1
APHC010215422026
IN TH
WEDNESDAY
TWO
THE HONOURABLE SR
THE HONOURAB
WR
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. MODUPALLI RAVI ABOUT
YEA HAMPAPURAM VIL DISTRICT - 515722
1. THE STATE OF PRINCIPAL SECR BUILDING, VELAG
2. THE DIRECTOR QUARTERS, MANG
3. THE DEPUTY INSP OFFICE, GULZARP
4. THE SUPERINTE ANANTHAPURAMU
5. THE DEPUTY SU ANANTHAPURAMU
6. THE STATION HO POLICE STATION, E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Y, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF A O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT RI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVEND BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR G RIT PETITION NO: 10774/2026 KUMAR, S/O. LATE VENKATA RAM ARS,
R/O. D.NO. 1-664, O. LLAGE, RAPTHADU MANDAL ANAN
AND ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESEN ETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, S GAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR - 522 GENERAL OF POLICE DGP, P GALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522 PECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE DI PET, ANANTHAPURAMU - 515001 NDENT OF POLICE SP, ANAN U DISTRICT - 515001 PERINTENDENT OF POLICE DSP U RURAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DIST OUSE OFFICER SHO, ANANTHAPU COURT ROAD, ANANTHAPURAMU DESH
APRIL DRANATH ROY GEDELA MUDU, AGED C. COLONY, NTHAPURAMU ...PETITIONER NTED BY ITS SECRETARIAT
POLICE HEAD
IG, DIG CAMP NTHAPURAMU, P, RAPTHADU, RICT - 515722 RAMU RURAL U - 515001
CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.No.10774 of 2026
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus - (i) directing the respondents to procude the body of the wife of the petitioner i.e., Mamilapalli Rangamma @ Chinni @ Rangamma Naidu, before this Hon'ble Court and set her at liberty (ii) declare the detention as illegal, arbitrary, unlawful, violative of principles of natural justice and also violative of the rights guaranteed under the Constitution of India and also contrary to the judicial pronouncements (iii) direct an independent, time-bound inquiry into the illegal detention and initiate criminal and disciplinary proceedings against the erring officers (iv) direct preservation of CCTV footage of the Ananthapuramu Rural Police Station from the early hours of 19-04-2026 to till date (v) direct examination of the wife of the petitioner in the All MS Mangalagiri, for medical examination and submission of medical report (vi) award compensation to the wife of the petitioner for the mental, physical and reputational harm caused to her and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct for the preservation of CCTV footage of the Ananthapuramu Rural Police Station from the early hours of 19-04-2026 to till date, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. MUNNANGI THANMAI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL
CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.No.10774 of 2026
The Court made the following: ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)
When the writ petition for Habeas Corpus is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in a crime that was registered against the corpus, she was arrested by the 6th respondent-Station House Officer of Ananthapuramu Rural Police Station and she was remanded to judicial custody and the petitioner and the corpus would seek their legal remedy of claiming for bail before the concerned Court.
2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader also would submit, on instructions, that a crime was registered against the corpus and in connection with the said crime, she was remanded to judicial custody.
3. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is closed, with liberty to the petitioner and the corpus to move for bail before the concerned Court. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
_____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
Date: 22.04.2026 MDP