Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/810/2026 of P. Rajasekhar, Vs Sri. Mukesh Kumar Meena, on 21 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 810/2026 Between: 1. P. RAJASEKHAR, S/O. P. CHENGA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 46

APHC010093422026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 810/2026

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. P. RAJASEKHAR, S/O. P. CHENGA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.8-76, RAMAPURAM VILLAGE, GUNDRAJU KUPPAM POST, NAGARI MANDAL, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. SRI MUKESH KUMAR MEENA, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE (MINES) DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. SRI W B CHANDRA SEKHAR, THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, IBRAHIMPATNAM, NTR DISTRICT.

3. SRI K V SATYANARAYANA, THE DISTRICT MINES AND GEOLOGY OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, PUTTUR ROAD, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondent under the Contempt of Court Act for willful and deliberate disobedience of the orders passed in W.P.No.22973 of 2025, Dt.10.09.2025

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. KANAKALA DEVI PRASANNAKUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. RAMAKRISHNA PATIVADA The Court made the following Order:

This Contempt Case is filed complaining the willful disobedience of the orders, passed by this Court in W.P.No.22973 of 2025, dated 10.09.2025.

2. When the matter has been taken up for consideration today, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents has placed on record a copy of proceedings, dated 17-04-2026, which have been passed in compliance of the orders of this Court, dated 10.09.2025.

3. In view of the same, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 22.04.2026 MSI

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 810/2026

Dated: 22.04.2026 MSI

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead