Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/33/2026 of CHINTHAPALLI HANUMANTHA RAO Vs KURAMA alias CHINTHAPALLI VAMSHI PRIYA on 21 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3572] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 33/2026 Between: 1.
APHC010658432025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 33/2026
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. CHINTHAPALLI HANUMANTHA RAO, S/O. CHINNA NAGESWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O. BATHINAPADU VILLAGE, KANCHIKACHERLA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT AND
1. KURAMA ALIAS CHINTHAPALLI VAMSHI PRIYA, W/O. HANUMANTHA RAO, D/O.VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O. PLOT NO.16, ROAD NO.2, NARAYANA REDDY COLONY, PHASE-LL, ASHOK NAGAR, NEAR BHEL, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE.
...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant:
1. P V N KIRAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent:
1. PARUCHURI INDUMATHI The Court made the following:
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 33 OF 2026 ORDER:-(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi NathTilhari)
This appeal has been filed by the appellant being aggrieved from the dismissal of his petition seeking divorce under Sections 13(1)(ia)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act,1955, vide judgment and decree dated 07.07.2025, passed in H.M.O.P.No.10 of 2022 on the file of the Court of the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Nandigama.
2. The appellant, namely Chinthapalli Hanumantha Rao and respondent, namely Kurama @ Chinthapalli Vamshi Priya, along with their respective counsels are present.
3. By order dated 12.03.2026, the parties were referred to the mediation. The report of the mediator of the Mediation Center of this Court vide ROC.No.469/APHCMC/2026 dated 15.04.2026 has been received. According to the said report, the matter has been settled in terms of the settlement recorded by the mediator in the proceedings dated 10.04.2026 signed by both the parties.
4. Learned counsels appearing for both the parties submit that the amount settled between them (as permanent alimony) has been paid to the respondent/wife vide the demand draft dated 08.04.2026. The details are mentioned in the proceedings.
5. It has been further submitted that the parties have decided to live separately after taking divorce by mutual consent.
6. Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties shall file petition seeking divorce by mutual consent in the appropriate forum.
7. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is disposed of finally, making the settlement recorded in the proceedings dated 10.04.2026 along with the report of the mediator as part of this Judgment.
8. The parties shall file a petition for divorce by mutual consent before the appropriate forum. The learned Court shall consider liberally to waive the cooling period and shall pass orders in accordance with law expeditiously.
9. No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ___________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J
____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI,J
Dated:22.04.2026 KNN
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 33 OF 2026
Dated:22.04.2026 KNN