Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/10360/2026 of PERAM SWATHI Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 21 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 10360/2026 Between: 1. PERAM SWATHI, W/O.PERAM RAVI, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.16/119, LAKSHMI NAGAR,
APHC010207952026
IN TH
WEDNESDAY
TWO
THE HONOURABLE SR
THE HONOURAB
WR
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. PERAM SWATHI, W D.NO.16/119, LAK DISTRICT
1. THE STATE OF PRINCIPAL SECRE VELGAPUDI, AM PRADESH-522503
2. THE DIRECTOR PRADESH, MANGA
3. THE SUPERINTEN ANDHRA PRADESH
4. THE DEPUTY SU (KADAPA)DISTRIC
5. THE STATION HOU 516001 YSR (KADA Petition under Articl circumstances stated in E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Y, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF A O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT RI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVEND BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR G RIT PETITION NO: 10360/2026 W/O.PERAM RAVI, AGED ABOUT 27 KSHMI NAGAR, CHENNUR, YS AND ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESEN ETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME, S MRAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE ALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-52250 NDENT OF POLICE, YSR (KADA H-516001 UPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, K T, ANDHRA PRADESH-516001 USE OFFICER, RIMS POLICE STAT APA) DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...RES le 226 of the Constitution of India pra the affidavit filed therewith, the High DESH
APRIL DRANATH ROY GEDELA 7 YEARS, R/O. SR (KADAPA) ...PETITIONER NTED BY ITS SECRETARIAT,
ANDHRA OF ANDHRA
APA)DISTRICT, KADAPA, YSR ION, KADAPA- H SPONDENT(S): aying that in the h Court may be
CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.No.10360 of 2026
pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents to produce Peram Ravi S/o. Lakshumaiah, aged about 32 Years, R/o. D.No.16/119, Lakshmi Nagar, Chennur, YSR (Kadapa) District, being my husband, who is in the custody of respondents, before this Hon'ble Court by declaring his detention to be illegal and arbitrary and release forthwith and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SHAIK MOHAMMED ISMAIL Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL
CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.No.10360 of 2026
The Court made the following: ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)
When the writ petition for Habeas Corpus is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that as the corpus was arrested in connection with crime that was registered against him that the petitioner and corpus are seeking their legal remedy of moving for bail and no further orders are required to be passed in this writ petition.
2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader also submits that the corpus was arrested in connection with the crime that was registered against him and he was remanded to judicial custody.
3. In that view of the matter, this Writ Petition for Habeas Corpus is not maintainable.
4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner and the corpus are at liberty to move for bail before the concerned Court. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
_____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
Date: 22.04.2026 MDP