Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRP/2508/2023 of PATNAM PULLAIAH Vs PATNAM NAGAIAH on 21 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION Between: 1. PATNAM PULLAIAH, S/O.SUBBANNA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, 2. PATNAM SANJAY KUMAR,, S/O. SUBBANNA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, 3.

APHC010198292022

IN TH

WEDNESDAY

TWO

THE HONOURA

CIVIL R

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. PATNAM PULLAIA OCC. BUSINESS,

2. PATNAM SANJAY YEARS, OCC. BUS

3. PATNAM MADU,, S BUSINESS, ALL DORASANIPALLI V YSR DISTRICT

1. PATNAM NAGAIA Business, D.No.2/1 Mandal, YSR Distric Petition under Articl circumstances stated in pleased to allow the Civ 18.01.2022 made in 0.S Principle Junior Civil Judg IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Secti in the affidavit filed in sup condone the delay 387 pass Counsel for the Petition

1. V R REDDY KOVV Counsel for the Respon E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Y, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF A O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL REVISION PETITION NO: 2508/2023 AH, S/O.SUBBANNA, AGED ABOU Y KUMAR,, S/O. SUBBANNA, AGE SINESS, S/O.PULLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 35 L ARE RESIDING AT D.NO.2/148 VILLAGE, PRODDATUR TOWN A ...P AND AH, S/o.Subbanna, Aged about 55 147, Dorasanipalli Village, Prodda ct. ...R le 227 of the Constitution of India, pra the grounds filed herein, the High vil Revision Petition by setting aside t S.No.180 of 2016 on the file of th ge, Proddatur, Y.S.R District and pass on 151 CPC praying that in the circum pport of the petition, the High Court ma days in re-presenting the civil revis ner(S): VURI ndent: DESH

APRIL LAPATI UT 71 YEARS, ED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC. 8 AND 2/149, AND MANDAL, PETITIONER(S) 5 years, Occ. atur Town and RESPONDENT aying that in the Court may be the order, dated he Court of the s mstances stated ay be pleased to ion petition and

The Court made the following order:

Aggrieved by the order dated 18.01.2022 passed in Original Suit No.180 of 2016 on the file of the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge,Proddatur, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed.

2. No representation on either side.

3. As per the details of the Case Information System placed on record by the Registry, the Suit in O.S No.180 of 2016 on the file of the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Proddatur, was decreed without costs on 17.05.2024.

4. In view of the above, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________

JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

Date: 22.04.2026.

MP

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2508 of 2023

22.04.2026

MP

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead