Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/309/2022 of Mude Rajesh Naik Vs THE STATION HOUSE OFICER on 21 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 309/2022 Between: 1. MUDE RAJESH NAIK, S/O.JAYARAM NAIK,
APHC010188642022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
1. MUDE RAJESH NAIK, S/O.JAYARAM NAIK, AGED ABOUT 20
YEARS,
SUGALI
ST,
WORKING
AS
ASSISTANT
ANIMAL
HUSBANDRY, R/ 0. CHINNA BADIGI, H / O SETTIPALLE VILLAGE, SAMBEPALLE MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATION HOUSE OFICER, THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SAMBEPAILI P.S., REP.BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH
COURT OF A.P., AMARAVATI
...RESPONDENT
Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased toCriminal Revision Case is filed being aggrieved by the order dated 08.02.2022 passed in Crl.M.P.No. 222 of 2021 in Spl.S.C.No. 21 of 2021 on the file of SPECIAL SESSIONS JUDGE FOR
TRIAL OF OFFENCES UNDER SCs and STs (POA) Kadapa - FAC - 1sT
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KADAPA, IA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To stay all further proceedings in Spl.SC No. 21/2021 on the file of Special
Sessions Judge for Trial of offences under SCs and STs Additional Distirct and Sessions Judge, Kadapa pending disposal of CRlRC. and pass.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Suresh Kumar Reddy Kalava, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that, the relief has become infructuous in this matter.
2. Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State is in attendance.
3. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous.
Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 22.04.2026. UPS
Dt.22.04.2026
UPS