WP/9839/2023 of M SUHASINY Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 21 April 2026

APHC010189642023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA

PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH

WRIT PETITION NO: 9839/2023

Between:

1. M SUHASINY, W/O M.RAJA RAMESH, AGED ABOUT 41

YEARS,

OCC.

JUNIOR

LECTURER

(PHYSICS),

GOVERNMENT JUNIOR COLLEGE, RAJAHMUNDRY,

EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER

EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF

ANDHRA

PRADESH,

SCHOOL

EDUCATION

(IE)

DEPARTMENT.

SECRETARIAT

BUILDINGS,

VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. GUNTUR DISTRICT.

3. THE COMMISSIONER, INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION, TADEPALLY, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

4. THE

DIRECTOR,

INTERMEDIATE

EDUCATION.

TADEPALLY. GUNTUR DISTRICT.

5. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR, , INTERMEDIATE

EDUCATION,

RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM,

EAST

GODAVARI DISTRICT.

6. MAHATMA GANDHI JUNIOR COLLEGE, REP. BY ITS

CORRESPONDENT AND SECRETARY, ATREYAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

7. GOVERNMENT

JUNIOR

COLLEGE,

REP.BY

ITS

PRINCIPAL/CORRESPONDENT,

RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of

Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing the impugned proceedings vide Memo No.1710826/IE-A1/2002-3, dated 23-10-2022, by rejecting the claim of the petitioner for approval of the service of the petitioner and admit the petitioner in Grant in Aid with effect from the date of selection and appointment dated 27-09-2003, as junior lecturer in Physics in the 7th respondent college, and with all consequential service benefits, is illegal, arbitrary, capricious and discriminative and violating the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 16

and 21 of the Constitution of India. And set aside the same.

Consequently direct the respondents herein to approve the service of the petitioner from the date of selection and appointment of the petitioner dated 27-09-2003, and admit the petitioner Grant in Aid w.e.f. 27-09-2003 instead of 09-01-2005

with all consequential benefits applicable on that day including pension and arrears of the salary forthwith and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents 1 to 5 and 7 to fix the revised pay scale of the petitioner from the date of selection and appointment i.e., w.e.f.27-09-2003 instead of 09-01-2005, in the petitioner working post of Lecturer in the 6th respondent college by suspending the impugned proceedings of the 2nd respondent vide Memo No.1710826/IE-A1/2002-3, dated 23-10-2022 forthwith, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. N SAIDA RAO

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR SERVICES III

The Court made the following: