Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/23973/2023 of AVULA LAVANYA KUMARI Vs THE STATE OF AP on 21 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 23973/2023 Between: 1. AVULA LAVANYA KUMARI, D/O VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
APHC010451652023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO: 23973/2023
Between:
1. AVULA LAVANYA KUMARI, D/O VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, WORKING AS JUNIOR
ASSITANT
CUM
TYPIST,
0/O
ASSITANT
SOCIAL
WELFARE OFFICER, UDAYAGIRI, SPSR NELLORE
DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
SOCIAL
WELFARE
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI CAPITAL
CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DIRECTOR, SOCIAAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, TADEPALLY, GUNTUR DISTRICT
3. THE DEPUTY
DIRECTOR OF SOCIAL WELFARE,
(DISRICT
S.C.WELFARE
AND
EMPOWERMENT
OFFICER,) DARAGAMITTA, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE
DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not considering the case of the Petitioner for regularisation interms of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No.2201/2014, 6860/2014 and 6886/2014, as arbitrary, illegal, in violation of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to consider the case of the Petitioner for regularisation in the cadre of Junior Assistant cum Typist and revise the pay and release periodical increments in the light of the law declared by the
Hon'ble Andhra Prdesh Administrative Tribunal in the judgements in O.A.No.2201/2014, 6860/2014 and 6886/2014 on par with the applicants there in and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to consider the case of the petitioner for regularisation in terms of the law declared by the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in the judgments in O.A. No. 2201/2014, 6860/2014 and 6886/2014 pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SUBBA RAO KORRAPATI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES II
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayer; “…to issue an appropriate Writ Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not considering the case of the Petitioner for regularisation interms of the law laid down by the Honble Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in O A No 2201/2014 6860/2014 and 6886/2014 as arbitrary illegal in violation of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to consider the case of the Petitioner for regularisation in the cadre of Junior Assistant cum Typist and revise the pay and release periodical increments in the light of the law declared by the Honble Andhra Prdesh Administrative Tribunal in the judgements in O A No 2201/2014 6860/2014 and 6886/2014 on par with the applicants there in and to pass such…”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
5. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
__________________ D. RAMESH, J Date:22.04.2026 RMD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO: 23973 of 2023
Date:22.04.2026
RMD