Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/1087/2019 of TARIBOENA SREEKANTH Vs Tariboena Rajani on 21 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1087/2019 Between: 1. TARIBOENA SREEKANTH, S/O T.G RANGA
APHC010332362019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
1. TARIBOENA SREEKANTH, S/O T.G RANGA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT
32 YEARS, EMPLOYEE IN SOLUTION ARCHITECH, TATA
CONSULTANCY SERVICES, PLOT NO 42-P AND 45-P , UNIT 9, THINK CAMPUS, PHASE II, ELECTRONIC CITY, HOSUR ROAD, NEAR MAHINDARA STAYAM COMPANY, BANGALORE, RIO PLOT
NO 111, PRATHAMPURI COLONY, KAPRA, RANGA REDDY
DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. TARIBOENA RAJANI, W/O. SREEKANTH, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O PLOT NO 004, 1' FLOOR, RAJAHAMSA PALACE, SHIRDI
NAGAR, ANANTAPUR.
2. TARIBOENA HARSHITH, S/O SREEKANTH, AGED ABOUT 3 YEARS, RIO PLOT NO 004, 1ST FLOOR, RAJAHAMSA PALACE, SHIRDI
NAGAR, ANANTAPUR. (2ND RESPONDENT BEING MINOR
REPRESENTED BY HIS NATURAL GUATTLIAN AND MOTHER SMT
TARIBOENA RAJANI I.E., 151 RESPONDENT HEREIN).
3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF
ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to call for the records of order dated 06-09-2019 in FC MC No 2 of 2016 on the file of the court of the Family Court Cum Additional District Judge at Anantapur and set aside the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased be pleased to suspend the operation of the order dated 06-09-2019 in F.C.M.C. No.2 of 2016 on the file of the Court of the Family Court Cum Additional District Judge, at Anantapur pending disposal of the above criminal Revision and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. GHANTASALA UDAYA BHASKAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
2. ARTHIMALLA PRIYANKA
3. LEGAL AID
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Ghantasala Udaya Bhaskar, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that, the relief has become infructuous in this matter.
2. Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State is in attendance.
3. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous.
Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 22.04.2026. UPS
Dt.22.04.2026
UPS