Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRLRC/1029/2019 of Polepalli Ravi kumar, Vs Polepalli Umalakshmi, on 21 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL Between: 1. POLEPALLI RAVI KUMAR,, S/O SRIRAMULU, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, HINDU, R/O, KOMAROLU VILLAGE,

APHC010309592019

IN THE H

(

WEDNESDAY,T

TWO T

THE HONOURABLE DR

CRIMINAL

Between:

1. POLEPALLI RAVI K

YEARS, HINDU, R/O

PRAKASAM DISTRIC

1. POLEPALLI UMALAK

AGED

YEARS,

MIRIYALAPALEM, TR

2. THE STATE OF AN

PUBLIC PROSECUTO

AMARAVATHI

Revision filed under

circumstances

stated

in

CriminalRevisionCase, the

judgment order in Mc. 15/

Additional District and Sess

IA NO: 1 OF 2019

Petition under Section

in the affidavit filed in supp

pleased to stay all further

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

HE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL

THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

R JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PR

L REVISION CASE NO: 1029/2019

KUMAR,, S/O SRIRAMULU, AGED A

O, KOMAROLU VILLAGE, KOMAROLU

CT.

...PE

AND

KSHMI, W/O RAVI KUMAR, D/O PRAK

,

D.NO.49-1-2

1D,

NEAR

TRA

RUNKROAD, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DI

NDHRAPRADESH, REPRESENTED T

OR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRAPRA

...RESPON

Section 397/401 of CrPC praying t

n

the

affidavit

filed

in

support

High Court may be pleased toto set

/2017 on the file of Family judge cou

sions judge, Ongole, Prakasam District

151 CPC praying that in the circumstan

port of the petition, the High Court may proceedings in MC.No:15/2017 on the

L

RATAPA

ABOUT 34

MANDAL,

TITIONER

KASARAO,

ANSFORM,

STRICT

THROUGH

ADESH AT

NDENT(S):

that in the

t

of

the

t aside the

rt cum VIII

nces stated

be pleased

e file of the

family judge court cum VIII additional district and sessions judge court, ongole, prakasam district dated 22-08-2019

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1.MARKBABU GANGAVARAPU

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)

2.HARISH KATIPALLI

3.LEGAL AID

The Court made the following:

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1029/2019

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

JUDGMENT:

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel representing the petitioner would submit that, the relief has become infructuous in this matter.

2. Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State is in attendance.

3. Recording the said submission, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous.

Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 22.04.2026. KKV

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1029/2019 Dt.22.04.2026

KKV

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO.: Crl.R.C.No.1029 of 2019 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date

ORDER

OFFICE NOTE

11. 22.04.2026

Dr.VJP,J

The Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous.

(Vide separate judgment) ________ Dr.VJP, J KKV

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead