Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/1028/2019 of Bommadevara Rama Chandra Rao Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 21 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1028/2019 Between: 1. BOMMADEVARA RAMA CHANDRA RAO, S/O.
APHC010312032019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
1. BOMMADEVARA RAMA CHANDRA RAO, S/O. BABU RAO, AGED
ABOUT 42 YRS, OCC. ADVOCATE, RIO. H.NO. 2-118 KANKIPADU V
AND M, KRISHNA DIST.,
2. SMT. BOMMADEVARA VEERA BHADRAKALI, W/O. BABU RAO, AGED ABOUT 60 YRS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, RIO. H.NO. 2-118
KANKIPADU V AND M, KRISHNA DIST.,
3. BOMMADEVARA BABU RAO, S/O. LATE. NARASIMHA RAO, AGED
ABOUT 65 YRS, OCC. BUSINESS, RIO. H.NO. 2-118 KANKIPADU V
AND M, KRISHNA DIST.,
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR,
HIGH
COURT
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH,
AMARAVATHI THROUGH S.H.O. KANKIPADU P.S.
2. MRS BOMMADEVARA DURGA PADMAJA, W/O. RAMACHANDRA
RAO, D/O. PALA DHARMA RAO, AGED ABOUT 39 YRS, OCC.
PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O. D.NO. 9-163, DAVULURU VARI STREET, KANKIPADU V AND M, KRISHNA DIST.,
...RESPONDENT(S):
Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased to allow the CrI.R.C.
by setting aside the order dated 19.08.2019 passed in Crl.MP.No.5330 of 2018 in C.C.No.862 of 2017 on the file of the IV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate-cum - Additional Mahila Magistrate, Vijayawada and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay of all further proceedings orders passed in Cr1.MP.No.5330 of 2018 in C.C.No.862 of 2017 dated 19.08.2019 passed on the file of the IV
Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate-cum-Additional Mahila Magistrate, Vijayawada including appearance of the petitioners and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. B S N NAIDU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. YALLABANDI RAMATIRTHA
2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Ghantasala Udaya Bhaskar, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that, the relief has become infructuous in this matter.
2. Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State is in attendance.
3. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous.
Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 22.04.2026. UPS
Dt.22.04.2026
UPS