Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/3483/2025 of MODDU SUBRAMANYAM Vs S VENKATESWAR on 20 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3483/2025 Between: 1. Moddu Subramanyam, S/o. M.Munaiah, aged about 58 years,
APHC010610522025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3332]
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3483/2025
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Moddu Subramanyam, S/o. M.Munaiah, aged about 58 years, r/o. D.no.1-17, Amanduru village, Yerpedu mandal, Chittoor district, now in Tirupati district
...PETITIONER AND
1. S Venkateswar, District Collector, Tirupati District, Tirupati
...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is prayed that this Honble Court may be pleased to punish the Respondent / Contemnor under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act for flouting the Order, dt.2.2.2024 passed by this Honble Court in W.P.No.2636/2024 and pass such other order or orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstance of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. G RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. K M KRISHNA REDDY
The Court made the following order:
This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of orders dated 02.02.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.2636/2024.
2. Sri C.V.S.S.Sarma, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, pursuant to filing of this contempt case, the respondent authorities have complied with the orders dated 02.02.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.2636/2024 and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case.
Recording the said submission, the contempt case is closed. No costs.
Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.
________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI BRS