WP/5440/2019 of J SAROJINI Vs THE STATE OF AP on 20 April 2026

APHC010123532019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

WRIT PETITION NO: 5440/2019

Between:

1. J SAROJINI, JANGA SAROJINI W/O SATYANARAYANA REDDY

AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO. 8-43C, NAM BURN

VILLAGE, PEDAKAKANI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTICT

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE

STATE

OF

AP,

REPRESENTED

BY

ITS

PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY

DEPARTMENT

OF

HOME,

SECRETARIAT

VCLAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

3. COMMISSIONER

OF

POLICE,

GUNTUR

URBAN,

GUMTUR.

ANDHRA PRADESH

4. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MANGALAGIRI (R) GUNTUR URBAN

POLICE STATION GUNTUR

5. JONNALA RAJESHWARI, W/O VEERA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 54

YEARS, R/O DOOR NO. 12-100, RAMALAYAM VEEDI, NAMBURU

VILLAGE, PEDAKAKANI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

6. YEMINCLI PADMAVATHI, W/O SHIVA NAGESHWARA RAO, AGED

ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO. 58-5-29/1, RANGARAO

STREET, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA TOWN, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

7. YEMINEDI SHIVA NAGESHWARA RAO, SR) NAME NOT KNOWN,

AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO. 58-5-29/1, RANGARAO

STREET, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA TOWN, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

8. JONNALA RAVI KANTH REDDY, S/O VEERA REDDY, AGED

ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO. 12-100, RAMALAYAM VEEDI, NAMBURU VILLAGE, PEDAKAKANI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

9. JONNALA SIREESHA, W/O RAVI KANTH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 35

YEARS, DOOR NO. 12-100, RAMALAYAM VEEDI, NAMBURU

VILLAGE, PEDAKAKANI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

10. UNYALA RADHIKA REDDY, W/O BRAHMA REDDY, AGED ABOUT

40 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO. 16-2-222/3, 4/2 NAVA BHARAT

NAGAR, RINGU ROAD, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring inaction of respondents 1 to 4 in investigating and arresting the accused in pursuant to the complaint under FIR No. 290/2017

dated 09.09.2017 in Police Station, Mangalagiri ( R ), Guntur Urban filed under sections 420, 384, 506, 323, 254 r/w 34 IPC, 156(3) CrPC and petitioner filed complaint under section 190 and 200 of the CrPC when police has not taken appropriate action and Honorable Addl Sub Judge, Mangalagiri directed under CFR No. 1161 / 2017 dated 04.09.2017 is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Art 14 86 21 of constitution of India and directing the Respondent No. 4 to conduct through investigation and arrest the respondents 5 to 10 in the case and file report u/s 16(3) of CrPC consequently direct the respondents 1 to 4 to investigate and to file charge sheet on the file of Addl Jr Civil Judge, Mangalagiri in CFR 1161/2017 dated 04.09.2017 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct 4th respondent to complete the investigation under FIR No. 290/2017

u/s 173 CrPC and file charge sheet forthwith as the period of lapse of 1.5

years pending disposal of writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. P GOPAL DAS

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR HOME (AP)

2. ATLURI SIVA RAMA KRISHNA REDDY

The Court made the following:

WRIT PETITION NO.5440 OF 2019