Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/1092/2026 of UDINA PYDI RAJU Vs SRI Y SRINIVASA RAO on 20 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CONTEMPT CASE No: 1092/2026 Between: UDINA PYDI RAJU, S/O UDINA APPARAO, AGED ABOUT 48
APHC010128592026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CONTEMPT CASE No: 1092/2026
Between:
UDINA PYDI RAJU, S/O UDINA APPARAO, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCCUPATION TRANSPORT DRIVER, D.NO. 3-289, THARAKARAMMA
STREET,
VIVEKANANDA
COLONY,
PARVATHIPURAM,
VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SRI Y SRINIVASA RAO, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, SOUTH SUB DIVISION, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, VISAKHAPATNAM
DISTRICT 530001.
2. SRI K SRINIVASA RAO, INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GAJUWAKA
CRIME PS, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY,VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT
530026.
3. SRI A MANMADHA RAO, SI OF POLICE, GAJUWAKA CRIME PS, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 530026.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. MOCHERLA UDAYABHASKAR
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. A.JAYANTHI
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The instant petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 is filed the Petitioner praying to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of the order of this Hon'ble Court passed in W.P.No.28140 of 2025 dated 17.12.2025.
2. Heard Sri Mocherla Udaya Bhaskar, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Ms.A.Jayanthi, learned Government Pleader for Home.
3. Learned Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the order dated 17.12.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.28140 of 2025 has been complied with. Hence, no further orders are required in this matter and the contempt proceedings may be closed.
4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, recording the same, the case may be closed.
5. Considering the submissions, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:21.04.2026 Dinesh
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
C.C.No.1092 of 2026
Dt.21.04.2026
Dinesh