Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/9636/2019 of Kuda Bhargava Sai, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 20 April 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 9636/2019 Between: 1. KUDA BHARGAVA SAI,, S/O SATYANARAYANA,
APHC010219342019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
WRIT PETITION NO: 9636/2019
Between:
1. KUDA BHARGAVA SAI,, S/O SATYANARAYANA, HINDU, AGED
ABOUT
YEARS,
SCHEDULED
TRIBE,
R/O
H.NO.1-89,
SIRIBAYALU VILLAGE, PADERU MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM
DISTRICT, A.P.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
TRIBAL
WELFARE
DEPARTMENT,
A.P.
SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PADERU P.S., VISAKHAPATNAM
DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an order or orders and direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.2 in interfering with the petitioner's life is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Principles of Natural Justice under Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent not to interfere with the petitioner's life by following the 1st respondent Orders and direct the respondent No.1 and ITDA PO, Paderu to consider the application filed by the petitioner dated 17.07.2019 and examine the same and protect petitioner's life and career
IA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 2nd respondent not to interfere with the petitioner's life by following the 1st respondent Orders and direct the respondent No.1 and ITDA
PO, Paderu to consider the application filed by the petitioner dated 17.07.2019
and examine the same and protect petitioner's life and career pending disposal of the main writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KRISHNA MURTHY BELLAPU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
2. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE (AP)
The Court made the following:
WRIT PETITION NO.9636 OF 2019
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R:-
From 19.12.2025 to till date, this case underwent several adjournments. Though it is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today also there is no representation for the petitioner.
2. It appears that the petitioner has no interest to prosecute this Writ Petition.
3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
4. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
Date : 21.04.2026 TM
WRIT PETITION NO: 9636/2019
Date : 21.04.2026 TM